W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-awwsw@w3.org > February 2011

Re: AWWSW?

From: Nathan <nathan@webr3.org>
Date: Wed, 02 Feb 2011 08:50:02 +0000
Message-ID: <4D491ABA.50908@webr3.org>
To: AWWSW TF <public-awwsw@w3.org>
CC: Jonathan Rees <jar@creativecommons.org>
Nathan wrote:
> To summarize where this leaves us at the minute, we have four classes of 
> things:
> 
>  - Resource (can be named with a URI)
>  - NetworkResource (always unnamed)
>  - Representation (always unnamed)
>  - RepresentationElement (always unnamed)

and:
- Message (always unnamed)

I'd also suggest that by looking at every header used in http 
messages, we could set the domain of each accordingly such that some 
apply to the Message, some the Representation (if the message carries 
one), some the NetworkResource - and I'd be interested to see if any 
ever apply to a/the Resource (I've got a funny feeling the answer is no).
Received on Wednesday, 2 February 2011 08:51:59 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Wednesday, 2 February 2011 08:52:00 GMT