- From: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 13 May 2010 12:00:24 -0500
- To: David Booth <david@dbooth.org>
- Cc: Jonathan Rees <jar@creativecommons.org>, AWWSW TF <public-awwsw@w3.org>
On Wed, 2010-05-12 at 21:56 -0400, David Booth wrote: > On Mon, 2010-05-10 at 11:52 -0400, Jonathan Rees wrote: > > I always have a hard time remembering whether an RDF graph is an > > information resource or not, . . . [...] > > The overriding point is that, whether or not something is a "information > resource" is a *choice*: it isn't a matter of putting the Hogwarts > sorting hat on X to find out whether X *is* an information resource by > nature. It's a matter of *deciding* whether to view X as an information > resource when one mints a URI for X. And by the httpRange-14 rule, if > you configure your server to give 200 responses, you have indicated that > you have chosen to view X as an "information resource" (in addition to > whatever else it might be). That works for me. -- Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/ gpg D3C2 887B 0F92 6005 C541 0875 0F91 96DE 6E52 C29E
Received on Thursday, 13 May 2010 17:00:06 UTC