- From: Jonathan Rees <jar@creativecommons.org>
- Date: Tue, 24 Nov 2009 08:02:31 -0500
- To: AWWSW TF <public-awwsw@w3.org>
See for example http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-httpbis-p1-messaging-08#section-2.6.1, which is a pretty thorough rewrite of the http URI scheme registration. I suspect we have Roy to thank for this. We've been waiting for these drafts for quite a while; I haven't been monitoring this list as closely as I ought to and didn't see the announcement. I haven't checked what they ended up saying about GET/303. We really need to follow httpbis since that's the document we'll need to be consistent with, not the original 2616. The section on the http: scheme is inconsistent on what the URI is supposed to identify. I will send a comment to the list asking for a correction. Jonathan
Received on Tuesday, 24 November 2009 13:03:05 UTC