W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-awwsw@w3.org > May 2009

Re: JAR's exploration of TimBL's notion of information resource

From: Alan Ruttenberg <alanruttenberg@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 26 May 2009 13:18:03 -0400
Message-ID: <29af5e2d0905261018g773c1a64l578c4a83f4215cc7@mail.gmail.com>
To: Jonathan Rees <jar@creativecommons.org>
Cc: AWWSW TF <public-awwsw@w3.org>
For the moment I will simply point out that one of the initiations of
this group was that we wanted to be precise about how one would do an
audit to see whether a server was was conforming to web architecture.
It seems to me your answer is "you look at the representations and
decide". That isn't a particularly satisfying answer, but if that's
it, then we might as well shut the thing down and declare success.


On Tue, May 26, 2009 at 1:10 PM, Jonathan Rees <jar@creativecommons.org> wrote:
>> Right, and I have no way to assess (so far) what is or isn't evidence
>> other than the response code being 200.
> You look at it. If G is Moby Dick, and the entity isn't a wa-representation
> of Moby Dick, then the URI isn't meant to name Moby Dick.
Received on Tuesday, 26 May 2009 17:19:00 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 20:21:07 UTC