- From: Jonathan Rees <jar@creativecommons.org>
- Date: Fri, 13 Mar 2009 12:30:34 -0400
- To: Alan Ruttenberg <alanruttenberg@gmail.com>
- Cc: AWWSW TF <public-awwsw@w3.org>, "Henry S. Thompson" <ht@inf.ed.ac.uk>
On Mon, Mar 9, 2009 at 11:18 AM, Alan Ruttenberg <alanruttenberg@gmail.com> wrote: > 4) I'm a bit dubious about the time varying information thing. I think > there are series of information things non-time-varying, and certain > kinds of processes that group such together. These processes are > different enough that I don't know how informative it is to talk about > the time varying thing on its own. Rather than removing Tim's class from the diagram or ontology, I suggest making more 'spokes' to account for as many models as we care to look at it. IAO (which is what I think you're getting at above) could be another spoke, and AWWW (with nonsense boxes for 'information resource', 'essential characteristic', 'message' and so on) could be yet another. For now I prefer being inclusive, and letting nonsense wither, to being exclusive. But I agree we should review that stance from time to time.
Received on Friday, 13 March 2009 16:31:13 UTC