RE: Http.owl (was RE: JAR conflict for July 7 AWWSW telecon)

> >> I don't know - as you can tell my usual method is to try a term on for
> >> size for a while, and change it every few weeks until I settle on
> >> something I like. I guess this is annoying. Alan suggests we just use
> >> numbers in the URIs and then let the labels drift until they find a
> >> nice place. (Will TopBraid show labels instead of URIs? I'll see if
> >> Protege does.)
> >
> > Yes it does... Though there don't seem to me to be too many 
> in http.owl (the one that I originally downloaded).
> 
> Just added some labels for you. -Jonathan

Ok... FWIW... Wqith some cache/proxy flushing required to get the updated file.. attached are labeled and qnamed variants of the Topbraid diagrams.

Stuart
--

Received on Monday, 6 July 2009 16:13:05 UTC