W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-awwsw@w3.org > July 2009

RE: Http.owl (was RE: JAR conflict for July 7 AWWSW telecon)

From: Williams, Stuart (HP Labs, Bristol) <skw@hp.com>
Date: Mon, 6 Jul 2009 16:12:05 +0000
To: Jonathan Rees <jar@creativecommons.org>
CC: AWWSW TF <public-awwsw@w3.org>
Message-ID: <233101CD2D78D64E8C6691E90030E5C832D33A660A@GVW1120EXC.americas.hpqcorp.net>
> >> I don't know - as you can tell my usual method is to try a term on for
> >> size for a while, and change it every few weeks until I settle on
> >> something I like. I guess this is annoying. Alan suggests we just use
> >> numbers in the URIs and then let the labels drift until they find a
> >> nice place. (Will TopBraid show labels instead of URIs? I'll see if
> >> Protege does.)
> >
> > Yes it does... Though there don't seem to me to be too many 
> in http.owl (the one that I originally downloaded).
> 
> Just added some labels for you. -Jonathan

Ok... FWIW... Wqith some cache/proxy flushing required to get the updated file.. attached are labeled and qnamed variants of the Topbraid diagrams.

Stuart
--

httpOverviewQnames.png
(image/png attachment: httpOverviewQnames.png)

httpOverviewLabels.png
(image/png attachment: httpOverviewLabels.png)

Received on Monday, 6 July 2009 16:13:05 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 6 July 2009 16:13:07 GMT