W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-awwsw@w3.org > July 2009

Http.owl (was RE: JAR conflict for July 7 AWWSW telecon)

From: Williams, Stuart (HP Labs, Bristol) <skw@hp.com>
Date: Mon, 6 Jul 2009 13:11:04 +0000
To: Jonathan Rees <jar@creativecommons.org>
CC: AWWSW TF <public-awwsw@w3.org>
Message-ID: <233101CD2D78D64E8C6691E90030E5C832D33A64C0@GVW1120EXC.americas.hpqcorp.net>
Hello Jonathan,

The one relation that I can't make sense of (yet) in http.owl is "http:ofWaRepresentation" the associated comment says:

	"C hasWaRepresentation R when R is the wa-representation that corresponds to the resource in which C inheres during C's lifetime."

which seems to be a comment about a different relation... Or at least has not kept up with some name changes. Domain and range of "ofWaRepresentation" are "http:Message" and "http:Entity" respectively which has left me confused about the intent of the relation.



> -----Original Message-----
> From: Jonathan Rees [mailto:jar@creativecommons.org] 
> Sent: 06 July 2009 12:12
> To: Williams, Stuart (HP Labs, Bristol)
> Cc: AWWSW TF
> Subject: Re: JAR conflict for July 7 AWWSW telecon
> 
> On Mon, Jul 6, 2009 at 5:13 AM, Williams, Stuart (HP Labs,
> Bristol)<skw@hp.com> wrote:
> > I too have a conflict and cannot make the call on 7th July.
> 
> OK, it looks as if 7 July is canceled.
> 
> I would still really like to get feedback on
> http://w3.org/2001/tag/awwsw/http.owl
> and
> http://w3.org/2001/tag/awwsw/jar-diagram-7.pdf
> 
> but I don't know if it's worth scheduling an extra call. Let's try
> email, and I'll meet with Alan R in person about it.
> 
> I want to start thinking soon about what should be in a report on this
> effort. Not that the work is anywhere near done, but I hope each of
> you (active participants) will think about what would be good content
> and structure, to help guide next steps.
> 
> Jonathan
Received on Monday, 6 July 2009 13:12:50 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 6 July 2009 13:12:50 GMT