- From: Jonathan Rees <jar@creativecommons.org>
- Date: Fri, 13 Feb 2009 07:44:45 -0500
- To: "public-awwsw@w3.org" <public-awwsw@w3.org>
Harry, did you say you'd have something for us to look at for our next call? If you send it soon, we can talk about it. Otherwise, I would like to suggest we continue with HTTP. My latest thought is that RFC 2616 really has two layers, a transport spec consisting of MUSTs, and a REST theory consisting of SHOULDs. So I think we might be able to finish up (or skip over) the transport layer soon, and move on to the REST layer (state, CN). If you want to see how I think CN should be understood see http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-tag/2009Feb/0080.html . As usual organizing AWWSW is painful because so little effort is going into it between calls, and that's none of our faults. But we agreed we'd keeping meeting, so let's. Jonathan
Received on Friday, 13 February 2009 12:45:29 UTC