- From: Jonathan Rees <jar@creativecommons.org>
- Date: Wed, 4 Feb 2009 11:50:51 -0500
- To: David Booth <dbooth@hp.com>
- Cc: public-awwsw@w3.org
I didn't mean to click on "send"... the message is buggy and unimportant... please disregard On Feb 4, 2009, at 11:50 AM, Jonathan Rees wrote: > You can put the same fftr:IR (i.e., identical representation > portfolio, with identical time variation) at distinct URIs, with > very different results. Consider the case where an HTML > representation contains a form with a relative URIref as the > action. The action is therefore a function of the URI. Posting to > the two action URIs do radically different things (one could cost > you money, the other could pay you money). > > You could argue that they're the same resource, darnit, or you could > redefine fftr:IR to be sensitive to the request-URI, but neither fix > would cause "resource" to match user expectations around bookmarking > (the use case the Tim always brings up). >
Received on Wednesday, 4 February 2009 16:51:34 UTC