- From: Booth, David (HP Software - Boston) <dbooth@hp.com>
- Date: Thu, 3 Jul 2008 20:28:49 +0000
- To: Alan Ruttenberg <alanruttenberg@gmail.com>, Jonathan Rees <jar@creativecommons.org>
- CC: "public-awwsw@w3.org" <public-awwsw@w3.org>, Stasinos Konstantopoulos <konstant@iit.demokritos.gr>, Ivan Herman <ivan@w3.org>, Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>, Phil Archer <parcher@icra.org>, W3C SW Coordination Group <w3c-semweb-cg@w3.org>, Matt Womer <mdw@w3.org>, "Peter F. Patel-Schneider" <pfps@research.bell-labs.com>
Bizarre! Apparently the W3C email archiver has partially canonicalized the URIs in Alan's message! When Alan wrote these lines: > - there is no reason to believe that <HTTP://purl.org/obo/obi.owl> is > the same as <http://purl.org/obo/obi.owl> according to the RDF The first of those two URI began with upper case "HTTP", and the second began with with lower case "http", but in the email archives they both start with lower case "http"! This also happened when Alan used bare URIs (with no angle brackets around them): > http://purl.org/obo/obi.owl > and HTTP://purl.org/obo/obi.owl are the same. That last URI begins with upper case "HTTP" in Alan's original message, though it appears as lower case "http" in the archives. However, I see that <http://neurocommons.org/page/Main%5FPage> made it through without being changed to <http://neurocommons.org/page/Main_Page> . I guess I'll report this to W3C sysreq. David Booth, Ph.D. HP Software +1 617 629 8881 office | dbooth@hp.com http://www.hp.com/go/software Statements made herein represent the views of the author and do not necessarily represent the official views of HP unless explicitly so stated.
Received on Thursday, 3 July 2008 20:30:33 UTC