W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-awwsw@w3.org > January 2008

Re: Example for consideration: Resource versus Representation

From: Pat Hayes <phayes@ihmc.us>
Date: Wed, 23 Jan 2008 13:26:55 -0600
Message-Id: <p06230905c3bd355d8729@[10.100.0.14]>
To: Jonathan Rees <jar@creativecommons.org>
Cc: public-awwsw@w3.org

At 10:41 AM -0500 1/23/08, Jonathan Rees wrote:
>I think our conversation yesterday got derailed a bit because we 
>started using the term "resource" without having first agreed on how 
>we wanted to use it.  The confusion reflects the underlying cultural 
>gulf that this group needs to bridge - one might call it "knowledge 
>engineering meets web architecture".

Worse: semiotics meets web architecture.

>Let's focus on trying to draw out Noah (and Tim) on the negative 
>assertion "a representation is not a Kwyjibo". Negative statements, 
>or conditions of potential inconsistency, are always much more 
>interesting and informative than positive ones. We just have to 
>figure out what the class Kwyjibo

Im even more sorry I missed this call. Is that pronounced 
"kwee-jib-oh" or "kwye-jee-boh"?

Pat
-- 
---------------------------------------------------------------------
IHMC		(850)434 8903 or (650)494 3973   home
40 South Alcaniz St.	(850)202 4416   office
Pensacola			(850)202 4440   fax
FL 32502			(850)291 0667    cell
phayesAT-SIGNihmc.us       http://www.ihmc.us/users/phayes
Received on Wednesday, 23 January 2008 19:27:10 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 July 2008 07:55:27 GMT