Re: Draft Auto WG recharter

Here are my thoughts:

--Perhaps a phone working session on the charter might be helpful?

—With RSI subsume VISS?  Will they remain separate?  It is not clear from the current draft.

—I agree with PatrickL’s move away from the term Infotainment to Vehicle Function. (See comments on Patrick’s pull request).

—I suggest we revisit scope.  It is ok, but could likely be cleaned up.

Otherwise, it is looking good to me.

Thanks,

Paul



Paul J. Boyes | INRIX | Director of Telematics and Standards - OpenCar  |  206-276-9675 | paul.boyes@inrix.com<mailto:paul.boyes@inrix.com> | www.inrix.com<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__www.inrix.com_&d=BQMFAg&c=QbuapHRvbn0JdC8vTVkPHg&r=PRAN7lum5Ra662QLho8LU3bhFjBvLXn3bBkFbW0Amjo&m=V5l0WXfOEJwhcE0JsN06mQ5SQhpXL-DuAuK3YcnTZoc&s=OqQVi_DcS5rv8or8hZdFvY0re6YF0Wl-_8okxrxOF0w&e=>

On Jan 22, 2018, at 10:48 AM, Ted Guild <ted@w3.org<mailto:ted@w3.org>> wrote:

Here is the start of draft re-charter for Auto WG

http://w3c.github.io/automotive/charter-2018.html


The @@ indicate dates are pending for VISS to CR. I expect us to
publish VISS before sending this charter to the AC. I welcome input and
will seek review from W3C Management before sending to the AC.

--
Ted Guild <ted@w3.org>
W3C Systems Team
http://www.w3.org