W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-audio@w3.org > January to March 2016

Re: Worklets spec status ?

From: Ian Kilpatrick <ikilpatrick@google.com>
Date: Sat, 6 Feb 2016 13:13:09 +1100
Message-ID: <CAJL3UpRgLPC8kYq5iuoBfoEmhY3YtPf2ht1o+-uxanXJCoB_hA@mail.gmail.com>
To: Alex Russell <slightlyoff@google.com>
Cc: Paul Adenot <padenot@mozilla.com>, "public-audio@w3.org Group" <public-audio@w3.org>, Shane Stephens <shanestephens@google.com>
Hey all,

I made a bunch of edits during Houdini.
See: https://drafts.css-houdini.org/worklets/

Major change is that this will require the modules infrastructure which was
just added to the html whatwg spec.

lmk if you need anything specifically.

Thanks,
Ian

On Thu, Jan 28, 2016 at 9:03 AM, Ian Kilpatrick <ikilpatrick@google.com>
wrote:

> Hey Paul,
>
> Over the next week I've got some time to spend on it, and aiming it to get
> to a stage where it's good for Houdini.
>
> What are the specific things that you need from it to move forward at the
> moment?
>
> PRs are great if you have the time.
>
> Thanks,
> Ian
>
> On Thu, Jan 28, 2016 at 8:51 AM, Alex Russell <slightlyoff@google.com>
> wrote:
>
>> +shane
>>
>> On Wed, Jan 27, 2016 at 6:46 AM, Paul Adenot <padenot@mozilla.com> wrote:
>>
>>> Ian,
>>>
>>> The Audio-WG (CC-ed) was wondering about the status of the Worklets
>>> specification. There are still a few things that need to be done until we
>>> have enough infrastructure to write the Audio Worklet text on top of it,
>>> and the Web Audio API really need this to go forward.
>>>
>>> Do you have an estimate on when you'll be able to find some time to work
>>> on it? Can we help in any way ? Since this is on the critical path for us,
>>> it might make sense we contribute in a more direct way, by directly sending
>>> PRs.
>>>
>>> Cheers,
>>> Paul.
>>>
>>
>>
>
Received on Saturday, 6 February 2016 02:13:39 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Saturday, 6 February 2016 02:13:40 UTC