W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-audio@w3.org > October to December 2015

Fwd: Formalizing our permissions model using the Permissions API

From: Joe Berkovitz <joe@noteflight.com>
Date: Wed, 18 Nov 2015 14:42:18 -0500
Message-ID: <CA+ojG-aHW6z9gL7nUp+TEWqW5q38PhAc0-hdnPw3L2yTXO595g@mail.gmail.com>
To: Audio Working Group <public-audio@w3.org>
Cc: Harald Tveit Alvestrand <harald@alvestrand.no>
Forwarding to the Audio WG since this relates to some of the output device
discussions we've had recently.

.            .       .    .  . ...Joe

*Joe Berkovitz*

*Noteflight LLC*
49R Day Street / Somerville, MA 02144 / USA
phone: +1 978 314 6271
"Your music, everywhere"

---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Harald Alvestrand <harald@alvestrand.no>
Date: Tue, Nov 17, 2015 at 1:36 PM
Subject: Fwd: Formalizing our permissions model using the Permissions API
To: "public-webrtc@w3.org" <public-webrtc@w3.org>

It was suggested to me that since this document deals with some IP address
access issues, it should also have attention called to it on the WebRTC

Here you are...

-------- Forwarded Message -------- Subject: Formalizing our permissions
model using the Permissions API Resent-Date: Mon, 16 Nov 2015 20:41:28
+0000 Resent-From:
public-media-capture@w3.org Date: Mon, 16 Nov 2015 21:40:55 +0100 From: Harald
Alvestrand <harald@alvestrand.no> <harald@alvestrand.no> To:
public-media-capture@w3.org <public-media-capture@w3.org>

I tried to think a bit about how I would formalize the permissions model
we have designed for WebRTC in terms of the permissions API's
permissions model.

After a while, it seemed to make sense, and I'd like to share it to see
if it makes sense to others.

The Google doc is here:

Anyone with the link should be able to comment, if you want to comment

The content is attached as PDF, which may be more accessible to some
(and is certainly more archivable).

Questions to ask:

- Is this something worth doing?
- If yes: Is this something that should be part of our core docs, a
separate doc, part of the permissions doc, or in some "other" category?
- Where did I go wrong?

Comments welcome!


Received on Wednesday, 18 November 2015 19:42:50 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Friday, 18 December 2015 09:00:35 UTC