W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-audio@w3.org > July to September 2015

Re: Accepting Audio WG proposals

From: Stefan Håkansson LK <stefan.lk.hakansson@ericsson.com>
Date: Fri, 3 Jul 2015 05:22:49 +0000
To: Joe Berkovitz <joe@noteflight.com>
CC: "public-media-capture@w3.org" <public-media-capture@w3.org>, "Audio Working Group" <public-audio@w3.org>
Message-ID: <1447FA0C20ED5147A1AA0EF02890A64B1D28E851@ESESSMB209.ericsson.se>
Hi Joe, thanks.

Let's see what comments/discussion they generate.

Br,
Stefan

On 02/07/15 21:31, Joe Berkovitz wrote:
> Stefan, Harald,
>
> I've created pull requests #210 and #211 for these two feature proposals.
>
> Best,
> ...Joe
>
> On Tue, Jun 30, 2015 at 6:06 AM, Stefan Håkansson LK
> <stefan.lk.hakansson@ericsson.com
> <mailto:stefan.lk.hakansson@ericsson.com>> wrote:
>
>     Martin was the only one providing feedback on this call.
>
>     His feedback was in two parts:
>
>     * Pointing out that it is device, not track, capabilities that are
>     proposed to be exposed via enumeratDevices
>     * The question if anyone is planning to implement
>
>     Regarding the first one: That is true, and perhaps we can find a better
>     way to expose this (and Joe has asked for input). But we've seen no
>     objection to the use case (allow the script to select or propose the
>     most suitable devices based on their respective capabilities).
>
>     Regarding the second one: yes this is a valid question. And features
>     that are not implemented may be removed at later stages in the document
>     process.
>
>     But we think that we should move forward with these proposals and create
>     pull requests for further review/feedback. Joe, is this something you
>     can take on?
>
>     Stefan for the chairs
>
>
>     On 23/06/15 09:16, Stefan Håkansson LK wrote:
>      > Hi all,
>      >
>      > we've recently received two proposals from the Audio WG as a
>     result of
>      > the Last Call (and the following discussions) of Media Capture
>     and Streams:
>      >
>      > * Add a constraint/capability for channelCount [1]
>      >
>      > * Add MediaTrackCapabilities discovery via enumerateDevices() [2]
>      >
>      > There has been very little list traffic related to these
>     proposals. We
>      > will consider the silence as an indication of that the Media
>     Capture TF
>      > considers the proposals being reasonable, and ask for PR's for
>     the spec,
>      > unless we hear anything else by Monday next week.
>      >
>      > Stefan for the chairs
>      >
>      > [1]
>      >
>     https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-media-capture/2015Jun/0031.html
>      >
>      > [2]
>      >
>     https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-media-capture/2015Jun/0034.html
>      >
>      >
>
>
>
>
> --
> .            .       .    .  . ...Joe
>
> *Joe Berkovitz*
> President
>
> *Noteflight LLC*
> 49R Day Street / Somerville, MA 02144 / USA
> phone: +1 978 314 6271
> www.noteflight.com <http://www.noteflight.com>
> "Your music, everywhere"
Received on Friday, 3 July 2015 05:23:18 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Friday, 3 July 2015 05:23:19 UTC