W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-audio@w3.org > April to June 2015

Re: AudioWorkerNode specification text status

From: Paul Adenot <padenot@mozilla.com>
Date: Wed, 29 Apr 2015 13:52:00 +0200
Message-ID: <CANWt0WotYUUwX7f1uWOhVUPUAZx2ohPo0O6-yhsb-xFxDoG4cg@mail.gmail.com>
To: Joe Berkovitz <joe@noteflight.com>
Cc: Chris Wilson <cwilso@google.com>, "public-audio@w3.org Group" <public-audio@w3.org>, Andrea Marchesini <amarchesini@mozilla.com>
Yeah for some reason I only read gh-pages, and did not check the PRs,
sorry about that.

Thanks,
Paul.

On Tue, Apr 28, 2015 at 8:45 PM, Joe Berkovitz <joe@noteflight.com> wrote:
> Paul, it sounds like you should be all set. Please let me know if otherwise.
>
> On Tue, Apr 28, 2015 at 2:18 PM, Chris Wilson <cwilso@google.com> wrote:
>>
>> Um, I DID finish up the proposal, and filed a Pull Request almost two
>> weeks ago, waiting for an editor to review.  :)
>>
>> https://github.com/WebAudio/web-audio-api/pull/511
>>
>>
>> On Tue, Apr 28, 2015 at 10:57 AM, Joe Berkovitz <joe@noteflight.com>
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> My understanding was that Chris was going to finish this up, and it was
>>> only a small additional increment on top of what he had already done
>>> (basically he had to clean up a few typos and complete the code examples).
>>>
>>> Chris, if you are not able to complete this writeup soon, could you
>>> please let the group know so we can determine who's going to do it? (I'd be
>>> happy to take this on.)
>>>
>>> Also,  I wrote a skeletal version of the resolution for this issue in my
>>> email regarding the minutes:
>>>
>>> The group agreed on adopting the 2nd approach outlined in Chris Wilson's
>>> draft of the AudioWorker specification, in which
>>> AudioContext.createAudioWorker() returns a Promise<AudioWorker>, which
>>> completes after the script is loaded and has run. When the Promise has
>>> succeeded, the AudioWorker is ready to use with no script-induced delays.
>>> All node configuration can take place within the worker script.
>>> onnodecreate and onaudioprocess event handlers are shared among all node
>>> instances; the passed-in event in both cases has a "node"property that
>>> refers to a audio-worker-side node handle object.
>>>
>>>
>>> ...Joe
>>>
>>> On Tue, Apr 28, 2015 at 12:29 PM, Paul Adenot <padenot@mozilla.com>
>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Hello WG,
>>>>
>>>> Are the resolutions regarding the AudioWorker we had during the
>>>> meeting of the first of April recorded anywhere, or does someone still
>>>> needs to write the text? I tried to look at various branches and forks
>>>> of various members of the WG, but could not find a definitive source.
>>>>
>>>> If it's not written yet, Chris, do you feel like finishing this up, or
>>>> should I take over editing this part (I'm happy to pick this up where
>>>> you left)?. Raymond maybe you did plan to take over editing of this
>>>> feature?
>>>>
>>>> We'd like to implement this in Gecko sooner than later, because it's
>>>> awesome, but we'd rather have a stable text before starting.
>>>>
>>>> Cheers,
>>>> Paul.
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> .            .       .    .  . ...Joe
>>>
>>> Joe Berkovitz
>>> President
>>>
>>> Noteflight LLC
>>> 49R Day Street / Somerville, MA 02144 / USA
>>> phone: +1 978 314 6271
>>> www.noteflight.com
>>> "Your music, everywhere"
>>
>>
>
>
>
> --
> .            .       .    .  . ...Joe
>
> Joe Berkovitz
> President
>
> Noteflight LLC
> 49R Day Street / Somerville, MA 02144 / USA
> phone: +1 978 314 6271
> www.noteflight.com
> "Your music, everywhere"
Received on Wednesday, 29 April 2015 11:52:49 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 29 April 2015 11:52:50 UTC