Re: "Edit-readiness" of TPAC items

sure.

On Thu, Oct 23, 2014 at 10:18 AM, Joseph Berkovitz <joe@noteflight.com>
wrote:

> Hi Chris, Paul,
>
> There are lots and lots of editorial issues with the spec, as we’ve all
> noted. Many of these are not difficult or contentious. To expedite
> discussion at TPAC, I would like to propose that the two of you go over all
> of the “Editorial/Documentation” issues flagged for TPAC 2014 and label all
> such issues that propose a straightforward and obvious resolution with the
> “Ready for Editing” label.
>
> The meaning of this label at TPAC is that Matt and I will merely ask for
> objections to committing the proposed resolution of each such labeled
> issue. The hope is that generally there won’t be any, and we’ll just move
> on immediately to the next issue.
>
> Of course, for this to work, issues tagged this way need to contain an
> obvious disposition preferably noted in the final comment or few. (And if
> you disagree about the edit-readiness of an issue, that should become
> evident at the meeting :-)
>
> Does this sound OK?
>
> .            .       .    .  . ...Joe
>
> *Joe Berkovitz*
> President
>
> *Noteflight LLC*
> Boston, Mass.
> phone: +1 978 314 6271
> www.noteflight.com
> "Your music, everywhere"
>
>