W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-audio@w3.org > July to September 2014

Re: Audio Workers - please review

From: Alex Russell <slightlyoff@google.com>
Date: Wed, 10 Sep 2014 10:00:49 -0700
Message-ID: <CANr5HFV1gU=NeziT49oO1imp-OiHZsn3=SWL+dA1=gMekih_3w@mail.gmail.com>
To: Olli Pettay <olli@pettay.fi>
Cc: Ehsan Akhgari <ehsan@mozilla.com>, Chris Wilson <cwilso@google.com>, "public-audio@w3.org" <public-audio@w3.org>
I see. It should be removed in favor of fetch().


On Wed, Sep 10, 2014 at 9:56 AM, Olli Pettay <olli@pettay.fi> wrote:

> On 09/10/2014 07:48 PM, Alex Russell wrote:
>
>>     e) The topic of whether or not synchronous APIs must be allowed on
>> workers is being debated on public-script-coord, and it seems like there is
>> no
>>     consensus on that yet.  But I find the possibility of running
>> synchronous XHR on the audio processing thread unacceptable for example,
>> given its
>>     realtime requirements.
>>
>>
>> You should remove XHR and, if anything, only surface fetch. Actually, it
>> was my recollection taht XHR isn't in the base interface for workers. Is
>> that
>> wrong?: http://www.whatwg.org/specs/web-apps/current-work/
>> multipage/workers.html#apis-available-to-workers
>>
>
> http://xhr.spec.whatwg.org/#interface-xmlhttprequest
> I can see Exposed=Worker there.
>
>
Received on Wednesday, 10 September 2014 17:01:58 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:50:14 UTC