- From: Olivier Thereaux <olivier.thereaux@bbc.co.uk>
- Date: Mon, 17 Feb 2014 17:07:08 +0000
- To: Chris Lowis <chris.lowis@gmail.com>
- CC: Audio WG <public-audio@w3.org>
Hi Chris, On 16 Feb 2014, at 15:20, Chris Lowis <chris.lowis@gmail.com> wrote: > Alternatively, working with this reminded me of the point raised by the TAG[3] about introducing constructors for each of the node types, and having the factory methods on the contexts themselves available (through a library?) as “syntactic sugar”. This would be a breaking change, but it would certainly simplify the specification of the two types of context. > > [3] https://github.com/WebAudio/web-audio-api/issues/250 Also related to https://github.com/WebAudio/web-audio-api/issues/257 ? As “breaking changes” go, this one sounds fairly drastic. What would the harm be in keeping the context method in addition to constructors? Too sweet? -- Olivier ----------------------------- http://www.bbc.co.uk This e-mail (and any attachments) is confidential and may contain personal views which are not the views of the BBC unless specifically stated. If you have received it in error, please delete it from your system. Do not use, copy or disclose the information in any way nor act in reliance on it and notify the sender immediately. Please note that the BBC monitors e-mails sent or received. Further communication will signify your consent to this. -----------------------------
Received on Monday, 17 February 2014 17:07:39 UTC