On Mon, Oct 21, 2013 at 6:19 PM, Chris Wilson <cwilso@google.com> wrote: > My dislike for the Media Streams Processing proposal was not its > incorporation of JS; it was that it RELIED on JS to do even basic > processing like gain, > That was never the case. > and in order to do pretty much anything in it, I would have to be writing > a lot of script myself, or including reverb.js, filter.js, oscillator.js, > etc in most of my projects. > There was always an extension point for specifying built-in effects. That I never got around to specifying and implementing a good set of them is admittedly my fault. Rob -- Jtehsauts tshaei dS,o n" Wohfy Mdaon yhoaus eanuttehrotraiitny eovni le atrhtohu gthot sf oirng iyvoeu rs ihnesa.r"t sS?o Whhei csha iids teoa stiheer :p atroa lsyazye,d 'mYaonu,r "sGients uapr,e tfaokreg iyvoeunr, 'm aotr atnod sgaoy ,h o'mGee.t" uTph eann dt hwea lmka'n? gBoutt uIp waanndt wyeonut thoo mken.o w * *
Received on Monday, 21 October 2013 16:54:22 UTC