W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-audio@w3.org > July to September 2013

Re: [web-audio-api] What should happen in case of cycles containing a delay node is under-defined (#75)

From: Olivier Thereaux <notifications@github.com>
Date: Wed, 11 Sep 2013 07:29:31 -0700
To: WebAudio/web-audio-api <web-audio-api@noreply.github.com>
Message-ID: <WebAudio/web-audio-api/issues/75/24244182@github.com>
> [Original comment](https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=23037#3) by paul@paul.cx on W3C Bugzilla. Thu, 22 Aug 2013 11:05:08 GMT

Right.

For what it's worth, in case of loop without at least a one block delay, Pd refuses to starts the processing ("error: DSP loop detected"), and Max mutes the subgraph containing the cycle, but does not log an error.

Reading the 2012-09-12 minutes, we still have to agree on whether we want to clamp in ms or block. I'd say that one block is better.

Either way, we could warn the author in the console (maybe only the first time it occurs), that his value has been clamped.

---
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/WebAudio/web-audio-api/issues/75#issuecomment-24244182
Received on Wednesday, 11 September 2013 14:32:59 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:50:11 UTC