Re: [web-audio-api] (JSWorkers): ScriptProcessorNode processing in workers (#113)

> [Original comment](https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=17415#66) by Olivier Thereaux on W3C Bugzilla. Fri, 27 Jul 2012 15:57:37 GMT

Marcus wrote (In reply to [comment #66](#issuecomment-24244696)):
> Sorry for the vague language. What I meant was that JavaScript processing MUST
> be done in workers, and only in workers, never in the main thread.

Ah, OK, thanks for the clarification. I guess we do have something approaching consensus here. Jussi seemed unsure at first but given Comment #30, the doubts seem to have been dispelled. Ditto for Grant. 

I will send a Call for Consensus on this to the list early next week - in particular I'd like to give ChrisR a chance to develop on what he said in Comment #3: “Some developers have expressed concerns that JavaScriptAudioNode *only* happens in workers.”

---
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/WebAudio/web-audio-api/issues/113#issuecomment-24244703