W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-audio@w3.org > July to September 2013

Re: [web-audio-api] (JSWorkers): ScriptProcessorNode processing in workers (#113)

From: Olivier Thereaux <notifications@github.com>
Date: Wed, 11 Sep 2013 07:29:50 -0700
To: WebAudio/web-audio-api <web-audio-api@noreply.github.com>
Message-ID: <WebAudio/web-audio-api/issues/113/24244408@github.com>
> [Original comment](https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=17415#18) by Philip J├Ągenstedt on W3C Bugzilla. Mon, 18 Jun 2012 11:23:13 GMT

If so, then "larger buffer sizes" should be a hard requirement. On my fairly powerful desktop computer a layout could block for at least 871 ms. The closest power-of-two at 48Khz is 65536, i.e. over a second. With that amount of latency it doesn't seems very useful.

---
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/WebAudio/web-audio-api/issues/113#issuecomment-24244408
Received on Wednesday, 11 September 2013 14:35:25 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:50:11 UTC