Re: [web-audio-api] (JSWorkers): ScriptProcessorNode processing in workers (#113)

> [Original comment](https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=17415#16) by Jussi Kalliokoski on W3C Bugzilla. Fri, 15 Jun 2012 13:23:44 GMT

(In reply to [comment #16](#issuecomment-24244388))
> (In reply to [comment #15](#issuecomment-24244385))
> > In any event, this does strike me as a show-stopper for having audio processing
> > in workers.
> 
> As Philip pointed out: should read "this does NOT strike me as a show-stopper"
> ;)

All right, I'm running out of points to defend my case, especially since I don't have a horse of my own in the race. :) And if it's one or the other, I prefer the audio processing is done only in workers instead of the main thread (obviously), but I still think it'd be wise to have both.

---
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/WebAudio/web-audio-api/issues/113#issuecomment-24244393