[Bug 23037] What should happen in case of cycles containing a delay node is under-defined

https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=23037

--- Comment #9 from Robert O'Callahan (Mozilla) <roc@ocallahan.org> ---
Clamping to a minimum of one block is only going to happen when the DelayNode
is part of a cycle. Hopefully your use-cases for low delays don't require
DelayNodes in cycles.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the QA Contact for the bug.

Received on Monday, 26 August 2013 21:22:35 UTC