W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-audio@w3.org > July to September 2013

Re: TAG feedback on Web Audio

From: Noah Mendelsohn <nrm@arcanedomain.com>
Date: Thu, 01 Aug 2013 10:31:41 -0400
Message-ID: <51FA714D.4050307@arcanedomain.com>
To: Chris Wilson <cwilso@google.com>
CC: Anne van Kesteren <annevk@annevk.nl>, Olivier Thereaux <Olivier.Thereaux@bbc.co.uk>, "robert@ocallahan.org" <robert@ocallahan.org>, Alex Russell <slightlyoff@google.com>, "public-audio@w3.org" <public-audio@w3.org>, "www-tag@w3.org List" <www-tag@w3.org>
+1

Noah

On 7/31/2013 1:43 PM, Chris Wilson wrote:
> In addition, I'd ask that you be more explicit than calling this problem
> "data races", because there's clearly some explicit effect you're trying to
> prevent.  Any asynchronously-programmable or event-driven system can enable
> developers to introduce race conditions.
>
>
> On Mon, Jul 29, 2013 at 10:09 PM, Noah Mendelsohn <nrm@arcanedomain.com
> <mailto:nrm@arcanedomain.com>> wrote:
>
>
>
>     On 7/29/2013 7:05 PM, Anne van Kesteren wrote:
>
>         On Sat, Jul 27, 2013 at 9:22 AM, Noah
>         Mendelsohn<nrm@arcanedomain.__com <mailto:nrm@arcanedomain.com>>
>           wrote:
>
>              >Again, I have no informed opinions on the specific merits,
>             just suggesting a
>              >useful role the TAG might play to clarify for the many
>             members of the
>              >community who are less expert on this than you are. Thank you.
>
>
>         I'm not sure we call out data races anywhere, it's something we
>         just don't do.
>
>
>     Well, my recollection may be faulty, but I think that one of the
>     reasons the TAG took the trouble to formalize things like the
>     architecture document was the belief that it's easier to ask skeptics
>     to stick to rules that have been written down, and especially those
>     that have garnered formal consensus through something like the
>     Recommendation track.
>
>     Whether it's worth taking a guideline on data races all the way to Rec
>     I'm not sure, but it seems that it would be worth setting it down
>     formally, perhaps in a TAG Finding/blog post/Recommendation or whatever
>     will get the right level of discussion, consensus building, and
>     eventually attention.
>
>     Certainly, of the many things that have come up recently relating to
>     APIs, this one seems deeply architectural and very much within the
>     TAG's remit.
>
>     Noah
>
>
Received on Thursday, 1 August 2013 14:32:12 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:50:10 UTC