On Thu, Aug 1, 2013 at 1:51 PM, Srikumar Karaikudi Subramanian < srikumarks@gmail.com> wrote: > 2. It may be clearer to make it explicit that an AudioBuffer can be > "associated with" multiple AudioNodes, some of which may be live and some > not and that the AudioBuffer is to be immutable as long as at least one of > these AudioNodes is live. The current "associated with" language reads > close to one-to-one association. > > 3. There is some residual nondeterminism with the ConvolverNode's liveness > being tied to its connect()/disconnect() calls. If a convolver node is part > of a voice's effect chain, it can be released without an explicit > disconnect() call and at a time that is not predictable due to reverb tails > and "dynamic lifetime". Not sure if this needs fixing or can be fixed, but > just pointing it out. > Good point. Liveness shouldn't depend on GC. We'd better say that only explicit disconnect() calls make the node non-live. Rob -- Jtehsauts tshaei dS,o n" Wohfy Mdaon yhoaus eanuttehrotraiitny eovni le atrhtohu gthot sf oirng iyvoeu rs ihnesa.r"t sS?o Whhei csha iids teoa stiheer :p atroa lsyazye,d 'mYaonu,r "sGients uapr,e tfaokreg iyvoeunr, 'm aotr atnod sgaoy ,h o'mGee.t" uTph eann dt hwea lmka'n? gBoutt uIp waanndt wyeonut thoo mken.o w * *
Received on Thursday, 1 August 2013 01:55:56 UTC