Re: [Bug 21550] New: PannerNode - include informative note on HRTF, point to reference/open examples

On 03/04/2013 02:21, "Robert O'Callahan" <robert@ocallahan.org> wrote:

>Did the group decide that standardizing the HRTF method is unnecessary?
>Why?

IIRC, there was no consensus one way or another. The question we mostly
talked about was how on much information should be added to specify HRTF.
There was consensus around the idea that HRTF is a fairly well defined
signal processing method, but that an informative pointer to open models
could help. Hence the entry in bugzilla.

Olivier



-----------------------------
http://www.bbc.co.uk

This e-mail (and any attachments) is confidential and
may contain personal views which are not the views of the BBC unless specifically stated.
If you have received it in
error, please delete it from your system.
Do not use, copy or disclose the
information in any way nor act in reliance on it and notify the sender
immediately.
Please note that the BBC monitors e-mails
sent or received.
Further communication will signify your consent to
this.
-----------------------------

Received on Wednesday, 3 April 2013 08:04:12 UTC