W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-audio@w3.org > October to December 2012

Re: [Bug 19561] WaveTable is poorly named

From: redman <redman@redman.demon.nl>
Date: Tue, 04 Dec 2012 20:15:33 +0100
Message-ID: <50BE4BD5.6040801@redman.demon.nl>
To: public-audio@w3.org
Hi there,

I was the one complaining about this :)

My main point was that the word 'Table' is confusing in the context of 
wavetable synthesis.
Maybe you could exchange it for the word 'Set' as in HarmonicSet or 
WaveFFTSet.
That way we could reserve the word 'Table' for the higher structure of 
wavetables, should it get implemented.

In wavetable synthesis the word 'Wave' is referring to the 
single-cycledness of the data and doesn't refer to the actual encoding 
(PCM or FFT) of the wave.
So from that perspective it would be cool to preserve the word 'wave' in 
the name for the data.

btw. How does the implementation of the oscillators work? Does it 
pre-render the fft data to pcm or does it do additive synthesis on the fly?


On 04-Dec-12 1:54, bugzilla@jessica.w3.org wrote:
> https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=19561
>
> Nasserbufahad@gmail.com changed:
>
>             What    |Removed                     |Added
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
>                   OS|All                         |Windows 3.1
>
Received on Tuesday, 4 December 2012 19:16:07 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:50:03 UTC