W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-audio@w3.org > October to December 2012

Re: Web Audio API sequencer capabilities

From: Jussi Kalliokoski <jussi.kalliokoski@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 8 Oct 2012 22:33:28 +0300
Message-ID: <CAJhzemUS8X69D0Mh1VXO6LPz+ph_LDY1y2b057c=md-jibASXQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: Chris Rogers <crogers@google.com>
Cc: Patrick Borgeat <patrick.borgeat@gmail.com>, Joe Berkovitz <joe@noteflight.com>, Srikumar Karaikudi Subramanian <srikumarks@gmail.com>, "public-audio@w3.org Group" <public-audio@w3.org>
On Mon, Oct 8, 2012 at 10:30 PM, Chris Rogers <crogers@google.com> wrote:

>
>
> On Sat, Oct 6, 2012 at 1:09 AM, Patrick Borgeat <patrick.borgeat@gmail.com
> > wrote:
>
>> I'm having a related problem at the moment with
>> setValueCurveAtTime, having a hard time figuring out how to scale a
>> normalized Float32Array (values from 0 to 1) to another range (say, for a
>> frequency from 2000 to 3000). Off course this could easily done in
>> JavaScript but I'd prefer to generate just one Array for each curve at
>> startup and scale it in the API, since it already can scale it in time.
>>
>> Scaling a signal is pretty easy: Put the signal through through a Gain
>> with value 500, patch it into the param, and set value to 2500 (it now
>> should oscillate between 2000 and 3000).
>>
>> Since the GainNode doesn't produce a signal we would need to feed him a
>> Unity signal, but all the possibilities I see in the API would require the
>> developer to specify the lifetime of the unity signal (I think it would be
>> more straightforward for a UnitySourceNode to be collected automatically).
>>
>>
> I think Joe already mentioned this, but if an AudioBufferSourceNode is in
> "loop" mode, then it's not necessary to manage it's lifetime, and it will
> simply play forever until gc.  Also, if an application often needs to deal
> with these "unity sources", then it's pretty easy to just create a single
> one, then share it among any nodes needing it.
>
>
>> Easiest way for the setValueCurveAtTime would to have 2 additional
>> parameters, a mul and an add (this is common in SuperCollider for example),
>> with a formula like value * mul + add. As mul could default to 1 and add
>> default to 0 you wouldn't need to set it if you don't need it.
>>
>>
> Adding these optional parameters to setValueCurveAtTime() seems quite
> useful.
>
>
>> Mut maybe a more general Mul/Add scheme for AudioParams could be found,
>> such as a mul/add parameter, which would be applied to any value change.
>> Again, with defaults of 1 and 0 it
>>
>>
> I was looking at the other AudioParam scheduling methods such as
> setValueAtTime(), and it seems like it's already trivial to call them like:
>
> param.setValueAtTime(value * mul + add, time);
>
> It's useful for the setValueCurveAtTime() method, since the operation
> needs to happen for all values in the curve, but for the other methods, it
> seems easy to do with the existing API.
>

Yes, and for setValueCurveAtTime(), perhaps one can use the DSP API.
Received on Monday, 8 October 2012 19:33:55 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:50:03 UTC