W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-audio@w3.org > July to September 2012

Re: [Bug 17793] New: AudioNode.disconnect() needs to be able to disconnect only one connection

From: Chris Wilson <cwilso@google.com>
Date: Fri, 20 Jul 2012 13:06:19 -0700
Message-ID: <CAJK2wqUdsOey68W2nHTZr2U2=kSZhehguT4qKpjAKeCSdvDATg@mail.gmail.com>
To: Peter van der Noord <peterdunord@gmail.com>
Cc: "public-audio@w3.org" <public-audio@w3.org>
That's my point - the only use of multiple inputs/outputs in the API right
now is cracking apart the channels.  I see why you want to have additional
control inputs/outputs from a node - I just don't think wrapping those up
in a numbered set of inputs/outputs is the right way to do it.  I'm
personally not even sure it's the best way to handle channels.

On Fri, Jul 20, 2012 at 11:44 AM, Peter van der Noord <peterdunord@gmail.com
> wrote:

>
> > ,   The "inputs" and "outputs" really are channels, to me.
> >
>
> Why not just inputs and outputs? The use of the word channels is
> confusing, when there's something else in the api with that name.
>
> connections have a certain number of channels ( even though connections
> arent exposed in the api).
Received on Friday, 20 July 2012 20:06:47 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Friday, 20 July 2012 20:06:48 GMT