Re: Interface naming conventions (was: Testing and Test Driver)

>
> Suggestion: Include the entire interface name, possibly excluding Audio
> prefix and/or Node suffix (as long as it's the same for all methods).


Agreed. I feel the Audio prefix is less useful than the Node suffix. The
suffix in my mind helps cement the fact that you're creating a node and not
something else.

On 19 July 2012 15:13, olivier Thereaux <olivier.thereaux@bbc.co.uk> wrote:

>
> On 19 Jul 2012, at 15:11, olivier Thereaux wrote:
>
> > Probably stating the obvious but - it sounds like the re-naming
> discussion should be high on our priority list. It obviously does not have
> a massive impact on the technology in the long run, but the pushback to
> such changes will only grow with time.
> >
> > Witness the discussion back in May about changing noteOn and noteOff to
> start and stop, and Chris' worry about all the code already using the "old"
> names.
>
> Better with a link: http://www.w3.org/2012/05/02-audio-minutes.html#item02
>
> Olivier