It's also easy to create a JavaScriptAudioNode that simply writes random samples to the output buffers. On Wed, Jul 11, 2012 at 9:41 AM, Chris Wilson <cwilso@google.com> wrote: > White noise doesn't benefit from the anti-aliasing done for periodic > waveforms, and it's actually quite easy to generate: > > var lengthInSamples = 2 * audioContext.sampleRate; // 2 = 2 second long > buffer. Arbitrary. > var noiseBuffer = audioContext.createBuffer(1, lengthInSamples, > audioContext.sampleRate); > var bufferData = noiseBuffer.getChannelData(0); > for (var i = 0; i < lengthInSamples; ++i) { > bufferData[i] = (2*Math.random() - 1.0); // -1 to +1 range > } > > > > On Wed, Jul 11, 2012 at 8:39 AM, <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org> wrote: > >> https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=17415 >> >> --- Comment #49 from Grant Galitz <grantgalitz@gmail.com> 2012-07-11 >> 15:39:09 UTC --- >> (In reply to comment #48) >> > Hi Grant, >> > >> > (In reply to comment #44) >> > > A bit off topic, but could we add nodes that generate specific >> waveforms? Like >> > > a sine/triangle/square/sawtooth/LSFR White Noise generator node? >> > >> > I think you are looking for >> > >> https://dvcs.w3.org/hg/audio/raw-file/tip/webaudio/specification.html#Oscillator >> > >> > Ideally, if you have any comment not related to a specific issue, >> discussion on >> > public-audio@w3.org is a better idea than hijacking the comment thread >> ;) >> >> Oh wow, I never noticed you had that implemented already. I'm wondering >> where >> the white noise osc is? >> >> -- >> Configure bugmail: https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email >> ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- >> You are on the CC list for the bug. >> >> >Received on Wednesday, 11 July 2012 18:12:26 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Wednesday, 11 July 2012 18:12:26 GMT