W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-audio@w3.org > January to March 2012

RE: [Agenda] Audio WG teleconference, 2012-02-27

From: Wei, James <james.wei@intel.com>
Date: Mon, 27 Feb 2012 06:48:54 +0000
To: Olivier Thereaux <olivier.thereaux@bbc.co.uk>, "public-audio@w3.org" <public-audio@w3.org>
Message-ID: <668CBE60026FE04AB5523C7C3CCB00F806605A@SHSMSX101.ccr.corp.intel.com>
Regrets. 

Best Regards 

James 


-----Original Message-----
From: Olivier Thereaux [mailto:olivier.thereaux@bbc.co.uk] 
Sent: Saturday, February 25, 2012 5:50 AM
To: public-audio@w3.org
Subject: [Agenda] Audio WG teleconference, 2012-02-27

Dear all,

Apologies for sending this a little late.
Here is a proposed agenda for our upcoming call.

Same time/bridge as last week:

When: 27th Feb, 8am Auckland, 11am SF, 2PM NY, 7PM London, 8pm Paris
Where Zakim bridge (+1.617.761.6200 / sip:zakim@voip.w3.org), code:
28346# ("AUDIO") and irc://irc.w3.org:6665 in #audio

All WG members in good standing are invited (indeed, expected) to attend.
Don't forget to send regrets if you can't make it.

Chris Wilson will be scribing (thanks!).

Proposed agenda:

I suggest we look at how we want to partition all the areas we are 
looking at into specs. This is especially important if we are going to 
re-charter the group to officially look at MIDI in the browser, but 
would be useful regardless.

I see basically 4 areas of work:
* Audio processing
* Audio Synthesis
* Audio capture
* MIDI events / GM in the browser

Can you have a think about which must be grouped together in the same 
spec, and which can (or should) be split into different specs that can 
evolve in parallel?

Time permitting, we can also get a quick update on recent work on the 
Use Cases doc and Spec Differences doc.

Thank you, talk to you on monday.

-- 
Olivier

Received on Monday, 27 February 2012 06:51:02 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 27 February 2012 06:51:07 GMT