Hi Chris, On 28/06/2012 19:26, Chris Rogers wrote: > This is one method in a family of methods which include "AtTime" in > their name: > > setValueAtTime() > linearRampToValueAtTime() > exponentialRampToValueAtTime() > setTargetValueAtTime() > setValueCurveAtTime() > > So I think it's important to maintain consistency here. Yes, good point - we should either keep those as they are or change them all. I note that the methods all use the "atTime" naming convention, rather than simply be called setValue, setTargetValue, etc because the latter set of names is used for the events. Is that correct? Olivier
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Friday, 29 June 2012 07:11:43 GMT