W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-audio@w3.org > April to June 2012

Re: Limit in sample or ms for circular routing (Re: Minutes of Audio WG Teleconference, 2012-05-30)

From: Robert O'Callahan <robert@ocallahan.org>
Date: Tue, 5 Jun 2012 11:06:40 +1200
Message-ID: <CAOp6jLbef-2hohu+_cBehJyqdP8otg0HVKqSUY58mUmTs6WXXA@mail.gmail.com>
To: Philip Jägenstedt <philipj@opera.com>
Cc: Olivier Thereaux <olivier.thereaux@bbc.co.uk>, Audio Working Group <public-audio@w3.org>
On Tue, Jun 5, 2012 at 10:59 AM, Robert O'Callahan <robert@ocallahan.org>wrote:

> "Producing no output" would of course need to be specified.
>
> I think your definition doesn't quite work, since it's possible to have an
> SCC that contains a DelayNode but also contains a cycle with no DelayNode
> in it.


So I think you probably need to find the SCCs of the graph with the
DelayNodes removed. All the nodes in those SCCs must produce no output.
Then you can carry on with the rest of your proposal.

Rob
-- 
“You have heard that it was said, ‘Love your neighbor and hate your enemy.’
But I tell you, love your enemies and pray for those who persecute you,
that you may be children of your Father in heaven. ... If you love those
who love you, what reward will you get? Are not even the tax collectors
doing that? And if you greet only your own people, what are you doing more
than others?" [Matthew 5:43-47]
Received on Monday, 4 June 2012 23:07:12 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 4 June 2012 23:07:13 GMT