W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-audio@w3.org > April to June 2012

Re: Missing information in the Web Audio spec

From: Robert O'Callahan <robert@ocallahan.org>
Date: Thu, 17 May 2012 10:41:44 +1200
Message-ID: <CAOp6jLYBn5ktYsGw3bap8JkP46+UfBL3Ou3APxskYKUoAh5VOg@mail.gmail.com>
To: Chris Rogers <crogers@google.com>
Cc: Philip Jägenstedt <philipj@opera.com>, public-audio@w3.org
On Thu, May 17, 2012 at 10:37 AM, Robert O'Callahan <robert@ocallahan.org>wrote:

> I understand that that is well defined. Very small delays do impose
> significant implementation constraints, however.
>

What I'm getting at, of course, is that if you have a very large arbitrary
cycle of nodes, containing a single DelayNode which delays by a single
sample, then you need to iterate over all the nodes in the cycle producing
one output sample per node, once per sample. That will require alternative
code paths to the normal, more efficient paths that use SIMD to process
multiple samples per node.

Rob
-- 
“You have heard that it was said, ‘Love your neighbor and hate your enemy.’
But I tell you, love your enemies and pray for those who persecute you,
that you may be children of your Father in heaven. ... If you love those
who love you, what reward will you get? Are not even the tax collectors
doing that? And if you greet only your own people, what are you doing more
than others?" [Matthew 5:43-47]
Received on Wednesday, 16 May 2012 22:42:14 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Wednesday, 16 May 2012 22:42:15 GMT