Re: [CANCELLATION] W3C Audio WG Teleconference, 9th May 2012

By contrast, I generally find group telecons to be an effective tool for
keeping a rhythm going to a WG's work.

On Wed, May 16, 2012 at 12:26 PM, Robert O'Callahan <robert@ocallahan.org>wrote:

> How about we make an effort to resolve every issue via email (or the issue
> tracker), and for those issues where that fails, try having a telecon at a
> time that suits the protagonists for that issue. Better still, direct
> contact between protagonists in whatever form suits them, followed by an
> email to the list summarizing the discussion.
>
> It's unlikely that I would actually need to attend a telecon at the same
> time as Opera people, since we mostly have similar views on what is
> required from a Web spec.
>
>
> On Thu, May 17, 2012 at 6:17 AM, Alistair MacDonald <al@signedon.com>wrote:
>
>> If we do have to reschedule, that would be a much better option than
>> switching 100% to the mail list. Issues have been much easier to
>> resolve on the calls than on the list.
>>
>
> [I'm surprised to hear that. I generally find all group telecons,
> including the public-audio ones, unproductive and frustrating compared to
> email.]
>
> Rob
> --
> “You have heard that it was said, ‘Love your neighbor and hate your
> enemy.’ But I tell you, love your enemies and pray for those who persecute
> you, that you may be children of your Father in heaven. ... If you love
> those who love you, what reward will you get? Are not even the tax
> collectors doing that? And if you greet only your own people, what are you
> doing more than others?" [Matthew 5:43-47]
>
>