Re: Audio WG telecons and first draft

On Wed, Nov 16, 2011 at 6:54 AM, Alistair MacDonald <al@signedon.com> wrote:

> I think Chris Rogers is currently on vacation for one more week. Chris is
> this the case, and when might you be available again?
>

Hi Al, yes, I'm about to leave on vacation and will be back December 11.


>
> Joe, I completely agree with your statement: "This is a crucial spec for
> the web and for the music software business in particular."
>
> This is why I would like to avoid holding telecons that do not have both a
> Google and a Mozilla representative present. However, if the rest of the
> group disagree, we can meet anyway. :)
>
> (There is also nothing stopping us discussing things on the mailing list
> in the mean-time.)
>
> For now, I have set up the following Doodle poll. Please fill this out at
> your earliest convenience:
> http://www.doodle.com/k9nz8b8x23t58iqm
>
> Many thanks!
>
> Alistair
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> On Wed, Nov 16, 2011 at 9:01 AM, Joseph Berkovitz <joe@noteflight.com>wrote:
>
>> I would just like to add my voice to Thierry's request. This is a crucial
>> spec for the web and for the music software business in particular.  Right
>> now it is difficult to point to this group's progress as a sign that HTML5
>> audio is taking a clear shape, when the meetings occur so rarely and there
>> is no clear roadmap to resolving the different proposals.
>>
>> At the same time, I feel we may be just a short distance away from
>> resolving these questions and achieving a great deal. Let's try to get
>> there.  It only needs some sustained attention and effort.
>>
>> Best,
>>
>>      ... .  .    .       Joe
>>
>> *Joe Berkovitz*
>> President
>> Noteflight LLC
>> 84 Hamilton St, Cambridge, MA 02139
>> phone: +1 978 314 6271
>> www.noteflight.com
>>
>> On Nov 16, 2011, at 3:44 AM, Thierry MICHEL wrote:
>>
>> Alistair,
>>
>>
>> Could you please schedule Audio WG telecons. We need to have regular
>> weekly calls if we want to move forward.
>>
>> We have a draft spec on the table as a firts publication
>> http://www.w3.org/2011/audio/drafts/1WD/
>>
>> We need to discussed the last bits, especially the SOTD section.
>>
>> We have 2 different proposals concurrently, we should have a statement
>> about how we plan to resolve the issue, how people should review the
>> proposals, and perhaps other details like implementation status; I'd also
>> like to see a more comparative description, etc.
>>
>> Cheers,
>>
>> Thierry
>>
>>
>>
>