Re: TPAC F2F and Spec Proposals

On 18 October 2011 11:05, Olli Pettay <Olli.Pettay@helsinki.fi> wrote:

> IMHO a spec which defines an API shouldn't leave out the part which
> actually defines what the API does.
> Currently it is not defined what the output of the API is.
> That makes it impossible to implement fully compatible implementations.
> It makes also automated testing pretty much impossible, and manual testing
> would rely heavily on user's perception.


I hear you and agree, but the status of Chris' spec is currently that of a
draft proposal so I accept vagueness in these areas whilst more important
high-level architectural details are discussed.


Anthony.