W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-audio@w3.org > October to December 2011

Re: TPAC F2F and Spec Proposals

From: Anthony Bowyer-Lowe <anthony@lowbroweye.com>
Date: Tue, 18 Oct 2011 12:35:05 +0100
Message-ID: <CAMCSOPWh-PVJBEusYgxOCGBA8TsmzqNAF+yN6hg0o-zxWK4mog@mail.gmail.com>
To: Olli@pettay.fi
Cc: public-audio@w3.org
On 18 October 2011 11:05, Olli Pettay <Olli.Pettay@helsinki.fi> wrote:

> IMHO a spec which defines an API shouldn't leave out the part which
> actually defines what the API does.
> Currently it is not defined what the output of the API is.
> That makes it impossible to implement fully compatible implementations.
> It makes also automated testing pretty much impossible, and manual testing
> would rely heavily on user's perception.


I hear you and agree, but the status of Chris' spec is currently that of a
draft proposal so I accept vagueness in these areas whilst more important
high-level architectural details are discussed.


Anthony.
Received on Tuesday, 18 October 2011 11:35:58 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 18 October 2011 11:35:59 GMT