W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-audio@w3.org > October to December 2011

TPAC F2F and Spec Proposals (was: Attendance for the AudioWG F2F meeting on Monday, 31 October)

From: Doug Schepers <schepers@w3.org>
Date: Tue, 11 Oct 2011 12:51:50 -0400
Message-ID: <4E947426.20700@w3.org>
To: Joe Berkovitz <joe@noteflight.com>
CC: tmichel@w3.org, Philippe Le Hegaret <plh@w3.org>, Alistair MacDonals <al@pwn.io>, public-audio@w3.org, "robert@ocallahan.org" <robert@ocallahan.org>, mgregan@mozilla.com
Hi, folks-

We are still planning to hold a TPAC F2F; we have confirmations from 
Alistair, Chris Rogers, Thierry, and myself, and we are also planning to 
meet with the Web RTC folks.  The Audio WG F2f may be short, but I 
believe there are important matters to be resolved there.

I think it's crucial to have someone from Mozilla there as well, since 
that is where the chief disagreement with Google's approach lies.  I 
understand that neither Rob nor Matthew can attend... is there someone 
else from Mozilla who could represent this viewpoint at TPAC?

In the meantime, it would be good to have more discussion on this list 
about the similarities, differences, and relative merits of the 2 
proposals on the table:

* Google's Web Audio
https://dvcs.w3.org/hg/audio/raw-file/tip/webaudio/specification.html

* Mozilla's MediaStream Processing API
http://hg.mozilla.org/users/rocallahan_mozilla.com/specs/raw-file/tip/StreamProcessing/StreamProcessing.html


I'm especially interested in understanding the implementation status of 
the various proposals, and in hearing how well they work with the Web 
RTC spec.  Also, are these specs incompatible, or are they just 
different facets of the general approach, and can they be integrated 
together in some way?


Thanks-
-Doug

On 10/6/11 10:02 AM, Joe Berkovitz wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> As much as I would like to attend this F2F, I have a prior commitment at
> another event that cannot be changed.
>
> ...Joe
>
> On Oct 6, 2011 1:29 AM, "Thierry MICHEL" <tmichel@w3.org
> <mailto:tmichel@w3.org>> wrote:
>  > Hi all,
>  >
>  > Following Doug's email about TPAC registration in Santa Clara
>  > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-audio/2011JulSep/0037.html
>  >
>  > Attendance for the Audio Working Group F2F meeting on Monday, 31 October
>  > is still *very low*: Only two participants
>  > - Thierry Michel <tmichel@w3.org <mailto:tmichel@w3.org>> (W3C/ERCIM)
>  > - Alistair MacDonald <al@signedon.com <mailto:al@signedon.com>> (W3C
> Invited Experts)
>  >
>  > If you plan to attend this meeting please voice now.
>  >
>  > If attendance remains at this critical level, we will have to cancel
>  > this F2F meeting, to avoid extra costs.
>  >
>  > Thierry.
>  >
>  >
Received on Tuesday, 11 October 2011 16:52:06 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 11 October 2011 16:52:06 GMT