- From: Stefan Håkansson LK <stefan.lk.hakansson@ericsson.com>
- Date: Tue, 19 Jul 2011 11:31:26 +0200
- To: "robert@ocallahan.org" <robert@ocallahan.org>
- CC: Ian Hickson <ian@hixie.ch>, "public-webrtc@w3.org" <public-webrtc@w3.org>, "public-audio@w3.org" <public-audio@w3.org>
On 2011-07-19 11:23, Robert O'Callahan wrote: > On Tue, Jul 19, 2011 at 6:02 PM, Stefan Håkansson LK > <stefan.lk.hakansson@ericsson.com > <mailto:stefan.lk.hakansson@ericsson.com>> wrote: > > A couple of other reqs (the ones about being able to spatialize and > mix audio streams and sound objects - F13 & F15) are really in the > Audio WG space. > > It would be a real shame if the APIs end up incompatible. > > > Indeed. I don't think these APIs need to be separated at all. See > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-audio/2011AprJun/0004.html > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-audio/2011AprJun/0105.html > and > http://hg.mozilla.org/users/rocallahan_mozilla.com/specs/raw-file/tip/StreamProcessing/StreamProcessing.html I agree! But we we face the challenge of having Audio WG, webrtc WG and whatwg to work in a coordinated fashion. Stefan
Received on Tuesday, 19 July 2011 09:31:54 UTC