September 22, 2016 ARIA TPAC Face to Face Meeting Day 1

web:
 http://www.w3.org/2016/09/22-aria-minutes.html <http://www.w3.org/2016/09/22-aria-minutes.html>

text:
https://www.w3.org/2016/09/22-aria-minutes.html,text <https://www.w3.org/2016/09/22-aria-minutes.html,text>

   [1]W3C

      [1] http://www.w3.org/

                               - DRAFT -

                             ARIA FtF Day 1

22 Sep 2016

   [2]Agenda

      [2] https://www.w3.org/WAI/ARIA/wiki/Meetings/TPAC_2016

   See also: [3]IRC log

      [3] http://www.w3.org/2016/09/22-aria-irc

Attendees

   Present
          Boaz_Sender, Charles_LaPierre, Debbie_Dahl,
          EricE_(part), JF, JamesNurthen, James_Craig,
          Joanmarie_Diggs, JohnJansen, LJWatson, MichaelC,
          MichielBijl, Mike_Pluke, Shane_McCarron, Sharron,
          Sharron_Rush_(part), aboxhall, alastairc, janina,
          jcraig, jessebeach, matt_king

   Regrets
   Chair
          Rich

   Scribe
          MichielBijl, jasonjgw_, David-MacDonald,
          David-MacDonald2, david-macdonald__, David-MacDonald3,
          alastairc, jcraig

Contents

     * [4]Topics
         1. [5]Education Outreach and the APG.
         2. [6]Accessibility Object Model
         3. [7]Demo
         4. [8]Cognitive Accessibility Task Force Interlock
         5. [9]Automated Testing
         6. [10]APG Update
         7. [11]Critical Needs Assessment Space for Speech
     * [12]Summary of Action Items
     * [13]Summary of Resolutions
     __________________________________________________________

   <MichielBijl> scribe: MichielBijl

   mhakkinen: something that has impacted assessment community,
   pronunciation by synthetic speech.
   ... we’re looking on guidance on how to ssml into ??
   ... we get a lot of non-native speakers who need correct
   pronunciation.

   richardschwerdtfeger: you’re looking to send it to the speech
   API?
   ... should get joanie in this room

   mhakkinen: we need to get our content rendered as students and
   teachers need them
   ... Apple has own speech markup, not as sophisticated as ssml,
   but we can work with it

   richardschwerdtfeger: if we put the ssml in the markup, what
   happens with Apple?

   mhakkinen: we want Apple to support ssml
   ... can we add attributes containing the ssml?
   ... we can come up with own data model
   ... you don’t want ssml inline in html
   ... attribute model would be nice
   ... in context of ARIA, would be nice as a web platform thing

   richardschwerdtfeger: you mention HTML, but would also want
   SVG?

   mhakkinen: all content that should be hinted in some way, we
   would like these attributes

   janina: IBM TTS is the only speech dispatcher (apparently)

   jasonjgw1: if we’re looking for a standard solution and want to
   share with dpub
   ... is it desireable to develop in context of ARIA?
   ... or rather develop it somewhere else?

   mhakkinen: if not here, we’ll look somewhere else

   richardschwerdtfeger: don’t think it’s an ARIA thing

   janina: ever platform has their own speech API
   ... little bit of a chain for each platform

   jasonjgw1: has to go through all sort of systems, AT, speech
   API, etc

   mhakkinen: how does that ssml mark up get to the speech API

   richardschwerdtfeger: it’s like you have a semantic block that
   isn’t displayed

   mhakkinen: what we’ve done is two attributes, one for ?? and
   one with a phonetic string.

   mck: isn’t that supported in CSS speech model?

   mhakkinen: some, but not all
   ... everything we need is in SSML, but not in CSS speech model

   joanie: if it worked would your problem be solved?

   mhakkinen: in that case I would like people to support CSS
   speech

   jasonjgw1: even though you can insert generated content, you
   can’t do ??

   mck: or we need a way to include SSML in the HTML

   richardschwerdtfeger: you want a block of content?

   mhakkinen: we’ve been able to do all we need with SSML via this
   attribute model

   richardschwerdtfeger: so for one element you have a pair?

   mhakkinen: yes

   richardschwerdtfeger: suppose that’s doable

   mhakkinen: yes, we can do it this way, but how do we get it to
   both speech API, help text, etc.

   richardschwerdtfeger: you would want to map it into the
   platform
   ... we can hook up with text help

   mhakkinen: we’ve spoken to them

   richardschwerdtfeger: I know Glen Gorden wants to do more for
   the education sector

   joanie: what is going through my head, and not been
   discouraged, if there is a use cage for this, and you can get
   this in CSS
   ... and every other AT has to support it as well

   mhakkinen: we want the AT pick this up, we don’t want other
   voices

   janina: they want AT to actually use the SSML

   jessebeach: have you considered the ruby element?

   mhakkinen: ?? visual component
   ... I don’t think it’s an option at all
   ... the web speech API is supposed to accept and consume SSML
   ... we’ve gone through multiple models, most people prefer the
   attribute model

   richardschwerdtfeger: do you have a proposal we can look at?

   joanie: we have three things to remember, one, if I support
   this, how do you know it’s not going to interrupt speech?
   ... we have to send it as separate info to the synthesiser.
   ... you said we need this now, with thousands of kids out there

   janina: different words might need different pronunciation in
   different context.

   richardschwerdtfeger: we’ll pick this up later

   joanie: if you could e-mail them to me (about mhakkinen slides)

   richardschwerdtfeger: Sharon you’re here for EO

Education Outreach and the APG.

   mck: little background on how this got started
   ... people expressing concerns with difficulty on how to use
   ARIA correctly
   ... lot of different ways on how to reach the developer
   community
   ... we need to make sure that it (APG) complements what is out
   there
   ... Three things
   ... 1. what would the goals be of the collaboration
   ... 2. Identifying some of the resources that already exist and
   updates to those resources
   ... have done a bit of that, so have some stuff for us to
   consider
   ... 3. how do we want to collaborate

   mkc: maybe some of that will become clear if we talk about the
   goals

   mck: I have three proposals for goals
   ... would like some feedback to see if these are appropriate
   ... first is creating awareness of the APG
   ... maybe using existing channels available to the W3C
   ... second, W3C resources should be consistent with APG and
   vice versa
   ... third, plan for the APG should be complete
   ... milestones are about 80% complete now
   ... having an outside set of eyes looking at the milestone plan
   would be good
   ... does this sound good to everyone?

   Sharron: all of this sounds consistent with what we do and how
   we opperate
   ... nothing comes to mind immediately on how to improve this
   list
   ... are you thinking mostly throughout the W3C or the industry?

   mck: more the industry
   ... there is all these resources, planning web accessibility
   etc

   Sharron: one of the things we found, our own goal, was to
   promote WAI resources
   ... we’ve realised that we need to promote it to the outside
   world
   ... but have also seen a lot of WGs within W3C also aren’t
   aware of WAI or APG

   mck: everyone on internal is also external

   Sharron: *laughs* yes

   mck: I would like to take some time to look at a couple of
   examples
   ... see EO at the footer of a lot of documents

   Sharron: maybe I should tell you more about the process
   ... we go through the document
   ... and then it sits there for a while till somebody has time
   ... we have a schedule for all documents within WAI
   ... are all assigned to someone
   ... at least reviewed anual
   ... there are 80 resources, so takes a while to get it all of
   the ground
   ... seems we’re getting ready to publish some of these
   revisions

   mck: it’s a good thing

   Sharron: we still have a little bit of coördination with staff
   ... publication is only done by staff

   yatil: we can publish stuff pretty quickly

   <mck> [14]https://www.w3.org/WAI/intro/aria.php

     [14] https://www.w3.org/WAI/intro/aria.php

   mck: one resource linked to in a lot of specs

   Sharron: we have so much documents in the EO docs that is
   outdated or wrong
   ... we’re also in the process of re-designing the WAI pages

   yatil: we might even use ARIA

   richardschwerdtfeger: so Sharron, your team is also doing ??
   ... I don’t want a repeat of ARIA 1.0

   Sharron: have recruited three new participants

   would be nice to have people from member organisations to
   participate

   yatil: WAI is wheelhouse of knowledge and doing stuff

   ARIA is techniques, but not just that, it’s a guide

   bring over stuff from APG to WAI(?)

   Sharron: we have ARIA throughout most of the stuff we have

   yatil: basically want to make tutorials for ARIA

   people that know what ARIA is, but don’t want to do a deep
   dive, could use a tutorial

   mck: new APG uses this approach

   not written in tutorial way

   are code examples

   for example to make sure that AT functions with it

   where ever possible reference instead of recreate

   alastairc: I work with large resources, we have a calendar of
   content

   to give you an overview of what’s coming up

   <alastairc> Example:
   [15]http://maadmob.com.au/resources/content_inventory

     [15] http://maadmob.com.au/resources/content_inventory

   jamesn: I see that EO can contribute a lot to ARIA

   but we don’t want EO documents should focus too much on ARIA

   WAI resources are too easy to understand

   All: *laughter*

   yatil: if we can make a clear line, this is the simple
   approach, can say look at APG for complicated example

   richardschwerdtfeger: to what degree are you incorporating
   videos in your education?

   Sharron: I can say that we produced a short series of videos

   we haven’t used videos at all in other resources

   mostly resource/budget issue

   but if it’s helpful, we might have to put it into consideration

   richardschwerdtfeger: if you can look into it that would be
   great

   thought of doing one for the quick reference

   yatil: do we do a screencast, or a lecture

   MichielBijl: screencast would be better, lectures take too much
   time

   yatil: also need to think about audio description, might be
   cimplicated

   mck: what might be useful, we have these APG example pages, but
   for somebody that is relatively new to accessibility and screen
   readers.

   a 2-3 minute video of somebody using that example with a screen
   reader

   to show what the expected behaviour is

   might be something that is easy to produce

   MichielBijl: sounds pretty good

   Sharron: have to remember that a 5 minute video often takes
   days to produce

   richardschwerdtfeger: ARIA has been doing a couple of models
   ... doing a best practices on SVG

   Sharron: think that’s a good place

   mck: might want a separate SVG best practices

   MichielBijl: how would that work with the new CSS best
   practices

   mck: difference is, apg is on how to use ARIA in another
   language

   so there is a difference to the CSS thing, that is just CSS
   language

   MichielBijl: yeah that makes sense

   MichaelC: are we talking about moving content from APG
   somewhere else, or other content into APG?

   <Zakim> MichaelC, you wanted to ask about relatioship between
   APG and other types of best practices

   richardschwerdtfeger: there is other things going on like dpub
   using ARIA, so maybe something on how to use ARIA to create
   accessible books

   mck: back to the WAI-ARIA overview, it doesn’t have a github
   repo assigned to it

   Sharron: yatil can setup a repo

   yatil: will also remove ARIA primer from the nav

   All: *cheers*

   Sharron: can put in wiki that these are view of APG or EO.

   mck: before we go there, I want to make sure that you know what
   our plan is

   <mck> [16]https://github.com/w3c/aria-practices/milestones

     [16] https://github.com/w3c/aria-practices/milestones

   mck: so have four milestones

   next public wd is in fourth quarter

   then we have PR, will miss some more complex examples

   we will have a second release with those missing examples and
   fixes

   We have a 2.0 milestone where we assign things as they come up

   As we are working on collaborating with other documents

   Rasing issues is the best way to bring it to our attention

   yatil: what would we do if we wrote a tutorial

   mck: best thing would be to mention James, Michiel, and me in
   the issue

   Or send me an e-mail and ask if we can add it to the agenda

   jamesn: any reason you don’t want wider ARIA review?

   yatil: review outside of APG is fine

   jamesn: not sure it’s an APG job

   <MichaelC> [17]ARIA contributors

     [17] https://github.com/orgs/w3c/teams/aria-contributors

   mck: would be awesome if we could assign issues to you guys
   ... if we have feedback on your documents

   would you need us to open GH issues?

   Sharron: yes

   yatil: every resource that is under EO, should have a repo, if
   not, contact me

   Sharron: we have 80 resources, some of those are multi page

   mck: you don’t have them lumped together right?

   yatil: some, like tutorials, because they’re considered one
   resource, but other are all separate

   mck: what is the timeline for the redesign?

   Sharron: hope to have the first things done by March

   like smart search and some visual changes

   mck: how do we see the progress in the meantime

   yatil: we have a closed basecamp, but there is stuff on the
   mailinglist

   best way is to follow the mailinglist at the moment

   richardschwerdtfeger: almost time for break, we will look at
   mhakkinen’s examples later today

   <br>

   <jasonjgw_> scribe: jasonjgw_

Accessibility Object Model

   <jcraig>
   [18]https://discourse.wicg.io/t/contributing-the-accessibility-
   object-model-specification/1702

     [18] https://discourse.wicg.io/t/contributing-the-accessibility-object-model-specification/1702

   <jcraig>
   [19]https://github.com/a11y-api/a11y-api/blob/master/explainer.
   md

     [19] https://github.com/a11y-api/a11y-api/blob/master/explainer.md

   James: he and Alice Boxhall are here to present work on the
   AOM.

   James acknowledges contributors and reviewers who have
   influenced this work.

   James notes the problem of intention events, which also relates
   to the work of the former IndieUI Working Group.

   <aboxhall> chrome.automation:
   [20]https://developer.chrome.com/extensions/automation

     [20] https://developer.chrome.com/extensions/automation

   He further notes work on the shadow DOM.

   <aboxhall> Mozilla a11yapi: [21]https://github.com/WICG/a11yapi

     [21] https://github.com/WICG/a11yapi

   <aboxhall> WAPA:
   [22]https://rawgit.com/cyns/wapa/master/wapa.html

     [22] https://rawgit.com/cyns/wapa/master/wapa.html

   He further notes the accessibility API proposals for the Web
   that have emerged recently, all of which are attempts to solve
   the same problems.

   The current effort was discussed at a face to face meeting in
   May and has been developed since hten.

   He notes the challenge raised by in-document idrefs -
   problematic in the presence of shadow DOM.

   Rich text editors are infeasible to implement/represent in
   ARIA. Retrofits for these applications to support ARIA are
   complex and inconvenient.

   The initial focus is on solving the problems that are already
   addressed on the various platforms but not on the Web yet.

   There is an expectation that all features must receive browser
   feedback form at least two different browser implementation
   developers.

   Privacy: user details will not be exposed to applications from
   this API.

   Responding to a questoin from John, he clarifies that this
   assumption avoids the privacy issues raised by IndieUI work.

   The code (that implements the API in applications) must be easy
   to author.

   The intended audience is expected to be framework developers,
   accessibility engineers, JavaScript accessibility consultants,
   etc.

   Alice: outlines the process by which interactive controls
   (e.g., buttons) are represented in the DOM, reflected in the
   accessibility tree maintained by the browser, then communicated
   to assistive technologies via platform-level APIs.

   AT can also activate a button via the accessibility API,
   resulting in a click event generated by the user agent.

   In contrast, a request to change the value of a slider cannot
   be implemented beyond the point at which it reaches the UA.

   The first objective to be implemented is that of modifying
   accessible properties. Next stage: responding to
   accessibility-related events. Virtual accessibility nodes with
   no corresponding DOM nodes. Introspecting computed
   accessibility tree (phase 4).

   Phases 1-3: analogous to a style attribute, where the
   attribute's value reflects the author-specified value, not the
   computed value applied to the document. Similarly, the API will
   initially reflect specified values.

   Alice notes how the API can implement object references to
   other nodes in the accessibility tree.

   Alice notes the significance of the shadow DOM for containing
   rendering details of elements. Example: a custom combo box
   (i.e., custom element), where the custom element has an
   associated shadow root and the elements comprising the custom
   combo box are in the shadow tree.

   The options in the custom combo box element are not shadow
   nodes - they're in the DOM of the containing document, not in
   shadow DOM. this raises the problem that it is impossible to
   refer to elements outside the shadow tree using idrefs on
   shadow tree elements.

   <jcraig> Pasting in Slide content:

   Alice provides an example of how the API (which solves the
   above problem and others described above) works to change the
   roles of widgets (e.g., from button to link).

   <jcraig> Agenda

   <jcraig> • History: previous proposals and vendor discussions

   <jcraig> • Common problems for noticed by browser vendors

   <jcraig> • Considerations for scoping

   <jcraig> • Audience for this technology

   <jcraig> • Example interactions

   <jcraig> • Tightly-scoped, phased development plan

   <jcraig> • Code samples and demo

   <jcraig> • Q &A

   <jcraig> Common Problems

   <jcraig> • DOM manipulation requirement of ARIA can perform
   poorly with large datasets

   <jcraig> • Reliance on in-document IDREF prevents some usage
   (e.g. Shadow DOM)

   <jcraig> • No way to receive accessibility events (e.g.
   increment a custom slider)

   <jcraig> • Some complex office suites (Google Docs, iWork for
   iCloud, etc) are challenging to make accessible through
   standard techniques: POSH+ARIA doesn't cut it.

   <jcraig> • Bonus: Accessibility Inspection and Testing

   <jcraig> Considerations for Scoping

   <jcraig> • Release cycle must be phased, and each phase must be
   achievable

   <jcraig> • Features must be implementable and have positive
   interest from 2 browsers

   <jcraig> • Implementations must not expose user details
   (privacy)

   <jcraig> • Implementations must not negatively affect
   performance

   <jcraig> • Code must be easy to author *

   <jcraig> * Easy [for the intended audience] to author. See next
   slide.

   <jcraig> Audience for AOM

   <jcraig> • Primarily experts, such as:

   <jcraig> • Frameworks engineers

   <jcraig> • Web components authors

   <jcraig> • Document suite developers: Google Docs, iWork for
   iCloud, etc. • JavaScript-fluent accessibility consultants

   <jcraig> • Accessibility test tool engineers

   <jcraig> • AOM may add convenience for the average web
   developer, but it’s not required.

   <jcraig> Tightly-Scoped Development

   <jcraig> 1. Modifying accessible properties

   <jcraig> will allow setting accessible properties for a
   DOM-backed node

   <jcraig> 2. Accessible actions/events

   <jcraig> will allow reacting to user actions from assistive
   technology

   <jcraig> 3. Virtual accessibility nodes (WebGL, etc.)

   <jcraig> will allow the creation of virtual accessibility nodes
   not associated with DOM

   <jcraig> 4. Introspection of the fully computed accessibility
   tree

   <jcraig> will allow reading the computed accessible properties
   for accessibility nodes

   <jcraig> Code Examples

   <jcraig> / Standard assignment of ARIA relationship by IDREF
   el.setAttribute("aria-describedby", "id_ref");

   <jcraig> / New. Assigning ARIA relationship by object reference
   el.accessibleNode.describedBy = [objectRef];

   <jcraig> * All syntax is subject to change

   <jcraig> Code Example: Shadow DOM

   <jcraig> <custom-combobox>

   <jcraig> #shadow-root

   <jcraig> | <!-- this doesn't work! -->

   <jcraig> | <input aria-activedescendant="opt1"></input> |
   <slot></slot>

   <jcraig> <custom-optionlist>

   <jcraig> <x-option id="opt1">Option 1</x-option> <x-option
   id="opt2">Option 2</x-option> <x-option id='opt3'>Option
   3</x-option>

   <jcraig> </custom-optionlist> </custom-combobox>

   <jcraig> Code Example: Shadow DOM

   <jcraig> / Assignment across shadow root boundary in web
   component const input =
   comboBox.shadowRoot.querySelector("input");

   <jcraig> const optionList =
   comboBox.querySelector("custom-optionlist");
   input.accessibleNode.activeDescendant = optionList;

   <jcraig> * All syntax is subject to change

Demo

   In the demo, the script overrides the role (changing it from
   button to link) in the accessibility tree, but the DOM remains
   unchanged - containing an HTML button element.

   James clarifies that the computed role is not yet available
   through the API.

   James's example: switch is a new role; the author should write
   role="switch checkbox"; which role was applied (switch in newer
   browsers and checkbox in those which odn't support the new
   role) cannot be ascertained today via any API.

   Responding to Matt, James clarifies that values which the
   script author has written to the accessibility tree via the API
   can be queried, but not computed roles/values. API inspection
   tools can nevertheless be used.

   Responding to Rich, James clarifies that in phase 4, the
   computed role (the in-browser role in the accessibility tree)
   is what will be reflected in the API.

   This is intended not to vary by platform.

   Alice clarifies that the values which have been set (in ARIA or
   the API) can be read, but now the value computed by the browser
   - until phase 4.

   The values set via the API take precedence over those declared
   in ARIA attributes.

   James and Alice develop the analogy with setting the style of
   an element (using attributes and using the API).

   Alice clarifies that, via the API, a query would show a role of
   button on both <div role="button"> and HTML button elements.

   Prior to phase 4 of the project, it isn't clear what values
   would be returned for properties that haven't been set using
   the API.

   Alice presents a demonstration of a canvas-based slider.

   The script adds an event listener to the accessiblity tree that
   sets the value of the slider, including the value of
   aria-valuenow.

   It is demonstrated using VoiceOver that the screen reader can
   change the value of the slider using this method.

   No keyboard events are involved.

   Matt notes that the keyboard events would still need to be
   implemented for users who don't run AT, but this feature would
   enable screen reader commands/touch gestures to be used to
   change the values/state of elements.

   Alice clarifies that the proposal (in its early phases) is
   meant to solve problems that do not have existing solutions;
   this API complements ARIA.

   The scope of each phase is narrowly defined with a view to
   progressive implementation that can be made available to
   developers quickly.

   Alice notes the GitHub repository to which issues can be
   submitted.

   <MichielBijl> [23]https://github.com/a11y-api/a11y-api

     [23] https://github.com/a11y-api/a11y-api

   <jcraig>
   [24]https://github.com/a11y-api/a11y-api/blob/master/explainer.
   md

     [24] https://github.com/a11y-api/a11y-api/blob/master/explainer.md

   James clarifies (answering a question from Rich) that the API
   spec refers to ARIA for the roles and other property values.

   <jcraig>
   [25]https://discourse.wicg.io/t/contributing-the-accessibility-
   object-model-specification/1702

     [25] https://discourse.wicg.io/t/contributing-the-accessibility-object-model-specification/1702

   Alice notes that the Explainer is the first document to refer
   to in order to understand the API.

   James notes the issues that need to be solved in the spec to
   address virtual accessibility nodes (those which are not in the
   DOM tree), event handling (requests from AT), etc.

   He also acknowledges the necessity of better debugging tools.

   He also notes implementation issues that necessitate division
   of the work into multiple phases as proposed.

   James notes ongoing discussions with Microsoft regarding their
   position with respect to this work.

   James acknowledges the contributors who have commented on the
   work so far.

   <richardschwerdtfeger> scrbe: David-MacDonald

   <richardschwerdtfeger> scribe: David-MacDonald

   <richardschwerdtfeger> scribe: David-MacDonald2

   <MichaelC> scribe: david-macdonald

Cognitive Accessibility Task Force Interlock

   <david-macdonald_> test

   <David-Macdonald2> Test

   <David-Macdonald2> Scribe: David-Macdonald2

   Lisa: much research was behind pay walls but we have summarized
   it
   ... want user to be able to do things safely

   Look at the table if you want to throw anything out

   <Lisa_Seeman>
   [26]https://rawgit.com/w3c/coga/master/gap-analysis/table.html

     [26] https://rawgit.com/w3c/coga/master/gap-analysis/table.html

   The tables come from the user research

   <Lisa_Seeman>
   [27]https://w3c.github.io/personalization-semantics/

     [27] https://w3c.github.io/personalization-semantics/

   PERSONALIZATION and user settings is another peice...
   aria-apart should figure out where they think that belongs

   There is a third peice

   Rich: has the group decided on a prefix

   LS: I don't care, could be aria could be Cogan, could be
   anything

   RS: does it need to be mapped to the a11y api

   LS: no

   S/Cogan/COGA

   <Lisa_Seeman>
   [28]https://github.com/ayelet-seeman/coga.personalisation/tree/
   JSON-Script

     [28] https://github.com/ayelet-seeman/coga.personalisation/tree/JSON-Script

   <david-macdonald_> test

   <david-macdonald_> scribe: david-macdonald__

   <david-macdonald_> Jason: what about users who rely on a11y
   API,

   <david-macdonald_> LS: many of our users don't know about a11y
   API

   <David-MacDonald3> scribe: David-MacDonald3

   Test

   IBM might get involved with personization
   j.singleton@hisoftware.com JSON

   S/j.singleton@hisoftware.com

   S/j.singleton@hisoftware.com/

   RS: what if a blind person wants to do that.

   LS: a script runs on load, a buttons can simplify, change
   things to simplify, such as a home picture instead of home
   button

   RS: we may want to use the aria prefix for anything that
   affects the dom

   Ls: I just want the support, but I don't care about the prefix

   <clapierre> [29]http://www.w3.org/TR/dpub-aria-1.0/

     [29] http://www.w3.org/TR/dpub-aria-1.0/

   <richardschwerdtfeger>
   [30]http://rawgit.com/w3c/aria/master/aria/dpub.html

     [30] http://rawgit.com/w3c/aria/master/aria/dpub.html

   Examples of attributes could be things such as... key points,
   example, note, warning, step, external, offers, advertisement

   Rs: we have a a lot of these in dpub

   <richardschwerdtfeger>
   [31]https://idpf.github.io/epub-vocabs/structure/

     [31] https://idpf.github.io/epub-vocabs/structure/

   Example shown... of how to simplify a form

   HTML is same but dom has changed

   Makes it easier to meet WCAG because we a trying to introduce
   new Success Criteria

   S/begpcause/because

   Establishing the priority of what is critical, and how can we
   show that it actually easier for users

   the last sentence is Jason

   LS: we haven't done research but we have know facts that
   complicated information is harder to learn, so simplification
   is useful. If you can load the symbol that the person is
   familiar with there is a better chance of success

   Thee are intelligent people with discalculia is 6% of
   population

   Numbers don't make a lot of sense to them.

   The research is obvious. If you speak to anot English speaker
   in Spanish they will not understand as well as they would in
   English

   JESSE: so should we at Facebook out a home icon on our Web page

   LS: no, it is the user recognised symbol.

   JESSE: no commercial we site would allow external downloads

   LS it's on the user machine...

   LS: we would want to have about 5 libraries for user groups

   <Mike_Pluke_> Can't hear!

   alastair: I've tested quite a few users with cognitive
   disabilities... do we also need implementors on board.

   Lisa: it would be a browser extension

   We don't expect development people to understand cognitive
   disabilities

   Craig: os have a primary button, main button, a subclass of
   button

   S/Craig/ James Craig

   <MichielBijl> MB: here is James Nurthen’s original proposal:
   [32]https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-pfwg/2015Dec/00
   36.html

     [32] https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-pfwg/2015Dec/0036.html

   <MichielBijl> (for primary button exposure via ARIA/a11y APIs)

   <alastairc> scribe: alastairc

   Ian: Have some concerns around adoption, persuading people to
   include this. Have seen attempts at personalisation before, not
   wanting to loose control of the site.

   Lisa: Trying to risk - manage that with 5 example user-files.
   The other driver is WCAG 2.1, so having a success criteria
   about showing alternative success criteria, the personalisation
   aspect could be easier.

   Ian: It could be very fragile though, e.g. removing widths on a
   nav item, but there are so many ways that it could have been
   positioned, it could break in many ways.
   ... Some aspects look quite straightforward, could be
   implemented very easily. I'd like to see a demo on something
   like Amazon's homepage, Facebook to work out some of these
   issues. It isn't unworkable, but will take a lot of testing.

   Lisa: There is the semantics that the author puts in, but then
   the question is whether the user-side script is robust.

   Richard: This is a good example of how it might work, but think
   that it needs to be upto the designers.

   Ian: It is also a design thing, not just developers.

   Lisa: It could be a matter of using 80% of the functionality on
   a particular site, could comment out the changes that don't
   work.

   Ian: If all of these attributes are specified in the site, it
   comes under the control of the site.

   Lisa: Have to have the semantics, as the user needs to be in
   control of which icons are used.

   Mike: Looking back 25 minutes, there's no way we can measure
   the precise effectiveness of these, but there is very solid
   evidence for use-cases. The execution could vary, but there are
   definitely benefits. That does need testing to quantify.

   JC: Ian pointed out it would be trivial for authors to do if
   there were a media feature for it.
   ... APA asked for a similar feature for dpub, there's a
   possibility for custom media features, over a month ago. That's
   a concrete path for this.
   ... Custom media queries would allow for getting to a
   prototype, might not be the solution, but you could show it.
   ... Goal of socialising the extension is that you can prove it
   is worthy. You are requesting some very specific features that
   aren't suppported by major platform. Some of you have
   considered me dismissive of this idea in the past, but I'm not
   opposed to it conceptually. I was dismissive of previous
   proposals because there was no clear path forward. CSS custom
   media features might be that clear path forward to [CUT]

   Richard: Web pages are very complex, just annotating it might
   not work. But, would also need a way to validate it would work
   correctly.

   Mat: If people have a cognitive disability can they define
   their own preferences?

   JC: Within the switch control community, there is usually
   someone to help set it up, then the user can further customise
   it.

   mhakkinen: In the education context, we would hope the student
   can set it up before testing time!

   Lisa: A lot of cog issues are localise, and sometimes are
   compensated. We were also anticipated starting with templates,
   perhaps with 3/4 questions that would guide to you a starting
   template.
   ... Another thought we're having, once the preferences have
   been established, anyone else using these semantics could
   access those preference file (security issues allowing).

   <jcraig> where you want to go./

   <clapierre> This could also be expanded beyond cognitive to
   color blindness and low vision disabilities and beyond.

   <jcraig> scribe: jcraig

Automated Testing

   <ShaneM>
   [33]https://docs.google.com/presentation/d/1-28KVLhJ6M0RDA96RQG
   7yn8Mxvfau3mssmQuuogIx98/edit?usp=sharing

     [33] https://docs.google.com/presentation/d/1-28KVLhJ6M0RDA96RQG7yn8Mxvfau3mssmQuuogIx98/edit?usp=sharing

   ShaneM: automating ARIA testing... TF meeting run by JohnG at U
   of Illinois

   we propsed architecture, then I implemented a prototype. Joanie
   built the real one which we'd like to demo today (If I get
   through the slides).

   WPT: Web Platform Tests... not difficult to adopt/use

   ShaneM: previous ARIA test efforts have been manual.
   exhausting, not exhaustive.

   design to get us thru CR.

   that's not the goal of testing... We want to reuse and run
   often. Continuous integration tests. ATTA == Assistive Tech
   Test Adaptor

   tool pulls testable statements out of the wiki and
   automatically builds the test *cases*

   now we want to build an ATTA for JS for the testing context,
   and then for every platform (e.g. Mac, Windows, etc.).

   slide diagram describing the test runner life cycle

   i/o from WPT is raw JSON...

   WPT scope of testing is limited to the browser (mostly...
   ignore WebDriver for the sake of this discussion)

   but the tests need to run across browsers/platforms. So the
   ATTA fills the gap between the WPT (browser) to the specific
   API test (platform)

   i/o is more or less pass/fail

   today we are sending pass/fail and any messages
   (platform-specific error message)

   Boaz: Is that a native app that runs on each platform

   joanie: Yes. it's like a CLI for Accessibility Inspector

   JohnJansen: Yes, ours is platforms specific

   Boaz: I love that the i/o from your ATTA more or less could be
   standardized

   ShaneM: There are a lot of ways we coud extend this in the
   future.

   skeletal one demoed here is implemented in Python. Joanie's is
   too.

   Still defining the declaritive model for these tests

   wiki link to testable statements:

   <ShaneM>
   [34]https://www.w3.org/wiki/ARIA_1.1_Testable_Statements

     [34] https://www.w3.org/wiki/ARIA_1.1_Testable_Statements

   Only implemented the refinement for ATK

   Still much to be added...

   <Zakim> MichaelC, you wanted to ask about the relationship
   between this test formalism and the mapping specs

   This table is describing human-added testable statements (if
   given this, expect that) and define the platform-specific
   expectations in a table

   <MichaelC> mc: this looks like the mapping tables in the AAMs,
   but more precise. Is there communication with the AAPI TF about
   this?

   <MichaelC> shane: not yet but there should be.

   richardschwerdtfeger: MSAA and UIA2 had to be separated b/c
   they ended up being too different to coalesce

   boazsender_: If given <html block>, expect this platform
   output, how do you generate the test

   ShaneM: I'll answer after the demo
   ... Joanie's demo is a manual test runner

   but the browser vendors can run this on an automated system

   in this case, we've selected all WAI-ARIA tests... ("raw"
   tests)

   ShaneM: maybe we should reorg our test directories on a
   per-spec or per tech
   ... in the WPT env, if you are running your own tests, you need
   to run a CLI server, and an ATTA on port :4119 (a11y) cuz we're
   nerds

   <ShaneM> Running the tests looks like this:

   <ShaneM> 1) start up the wptserve http server

   <ShaneM> 2) start up the ATTA for the platform under test

   <ShaneM> 3) access the runner interface of the wpt environment
   and select the tests to run

   <ShaneM> 4) click start

   <ShaneM> 5) output shows up

   ShaneM: When there are multiple assertions, because we have
   related assertions for each test

   boazsender_: what do you have to assert

   ShaneM: reads property assertions
   ... one result in the logging data, because the pass criteria
   is different for each platform

   joanie: I want to show the TBD list

   there are a few builtin features I want to share

   TBD tests will dump there entire output, so you can use a TBD
   test run to make a manual assertion and inform your testable
   statement

   Views the output of a serialized platform-side accessibility
   object which you can use to make your assertions

   <Zakim> MichaelC, you wanted to ask if test sanity checking can
   / should be done at a different layer than ATTA

   ShaneM: the make test script will sanity check the testable
   statement input

   not doing that yet

   joanie: sanity check needs a lot more ouput per test... not
   just failed, but why

   I would want a better presentation for all this data

   <JohnJansen> q

   Explains the ATK dump of this TBD test

   <Zakim> jcraig, you wanted to ask how you serialize pointers to
   other objects? and to ask if implementors have expressed
   concerns about leaking implementation version details and to
   ask

   jcraig: how you serialize pointers to other objects?

   joanie: need an identifier... all platforms are now exposing
   DOM ID... I think we can pass DOM ID through as relation type.

   jcraig: watch out for IDREF across doc bouandaries (web
   components)

   <ShaneM> Possibly permit other ways of specifying the object
   under test other than its "element" via the id attribute.

   jcraig: implementors have expressed concerns about leaking
   implementation version details

   joanie: no concerns for me.. microsoft?

   JohnJansen: I think it's okay.. still need to inspect more.

   <richardschwerdtfeger> here is the new accProbe repository so
   that we can look at the MSAA and IA2 bridge code from Java
   [35]https://developer.ibm.com/open/accessibility-probe/

     [35] https://developer.ibm.com/open/accessibility-probe/

   jcraig: Any security concerns with running privileged ATTA
   running potentially

   ShaneM: WPT environment has a rigorously reviewed

   JohnJansen: interesting consideration that should be threat
   modeled

   <richardschwerdtfeger>
   [36]https://github.com/IBMa/AccProbe?cm_mc_uid=5748199942621467
   2102162&cm_mc_sid_50200000=1474559258

     [36] https://github.com/IBMa/AccProbe?cm_mc_uid=57481999426214672102162&cm_mc_sid_50200000=1474559258

   JohnJansen: joanie adding CLI extensions?

   joanie: it has a dry run mode... passing straight to ATTA...
   and debug mode with port and host

   richardschwerdtfeger: Is the ATTA written in Python? How does
   is work?

   Joanie: Python3 in mine (Py2 for Shane)
   ... inspects through python binding for ATK SPI...

   ShaneM: NVDA has it's own layer that they implemented.

   richardschwerdtfeger: Not one for MSAA/UIA

   ShaneM: but I got it form NVDA directly... so we're good
   ... back to slides

   fill in missing testable statements

   are there missing event changes (???) in ARIA 1.1 we need to
   account for?

   mck: some event changes related to ???

   s/???/aria-haspopup/act-desc/busy

   ShaneM: manual mode needs finishing

   joanie: need to better present the terminal spew for human
   readability

   ShaneM: need error checking
   ... need Android and iOS as well
   ... SVG would also work in this test harness

   richardschwerdtfeger: some of the 1.0 tests are dependent on
   timing and sequential steps

   ShaneM: already built into the wiki, but you can write those
   manually
   ... tests that get generated are (updates Git repo...)

   from the wiki are consindered a step... but the arch allows /n/
   steps

   basically sequential scripting

   ShaneM: "delay 3s" for example would be one step
   ... shows JS includes for the test harness... ATTA and JS Test
   Runner

   shows source of JSON object serial test steps... or this could
   take a json.js file passed in

   ShaneM: plh suggested know the AAM mappings and generate those
   testable statements from generic ARIA assertions

   JohnJansen: ATTA Microsoft wrote is not as extensive as yours,
   but they (Edge and Firefox version) are both open-sourced on
   GitHub

   whereever the trees differ, we compared against the spec and
   filed bugs against Edge or Firefox

   <ShaneM> [37]https://spec-ops.github.io/atta-api/

     [37] https://spec-ops.github.io/atta-api/

   <richardschwerdtfeger> github.com/microsoftedge/a11y

   ShaneM: spec for this is on GitHub

   <richardschwerdtfeger> [38]http://github.com/microsoftedge/a11y

     [38] http://github.com/microsoftedge/a11y

   ShaneM: complex graphics are written in accessible SVG

   jcraig: more of this please

   joanie: unlike crazy a11y bugs, these are straightforward, so
   we can coalesce the output

   ShaneM: If we can mainstream A11y testing, it would be great

   <joanie> what I discovered is that a lot of issues were a
   single bug. They all need to be separate tests, however.

   richardschwerdtfeger: would really speed up testing for CR

   jcraig: and for browser continuous integration

   <joanie> So what I plan to do is add checks for "known issues"
   so we can include in the output notations that it's all one bug
   and provide the bug URL so people volunteering to run tests
   don't have to work too hard to figure out what is an unexpected
   failure.

   JohnJansen: inside a11y repo, there is an ATTA tool for web
   dev... run on your site
   ... targeted manually an ATTA for web devs... with an explainer

   group: discussion of pros cons of various API techniques for
   writing these ATTA tools

   joanie: my ATTA limits testing to localhost

   JohnJansen: ours runs inside WebDriver

   ShaneM: anything else?

   richardschwerdtfeger: great job joanie and shane

   group: *applause*

   <richardschwerdtfeger> scribenick: richardschwerdtfeger

APG Update

   MichielBijl: We need more people to be aware of this work
   ... We took out all the stuff we are going to work on for the
   December working draft
   ... There was a lot of outdated stuff from ARIA 1.0
   ... If people are pointed to the APG on github we would like
   feedback. Developers are not giving us feedback on things we
   have not reviewed

   jcraig: do each of these patterns reference working code
   examples?

   MichielBijl: I like activating a tab on focus but it does not
   work on iOS

   jcraig: that is listed as composite as optional for tab groups
   ... it is the way tabs work on Macs

   mattking: for a every example there will be functional
   patterns. These are for the most important ones that people are
   able see and test

   jcraig: I can send you a number of combobox examples
   ... from facebook

   MichielBijl: all of our examples are pure javascript and not
   component libraries
   ... we will have a code guide
   ... we need more actual developers on this to make the examples

   mattking: we have 5 people that are contributing code

   [39]http://rawgit.com/w3c/aria-practices/master/aria-practices.
   html

     [39] http://rawgit.com/w3c/aria-practices/master/aria-practices.html

Critical Needs Assessment Space for Speech

   mhakkinen: We have a critical need for text is not spoken
   correctly
   ... We have looked at SSML, CSS3 & PLS as an effective solution
   ... We need this precise authoring control and SSML does this
   at the markup level
   ... When some state in the US says you have to pause x seconds
   after something is presented (the rules vary by state) we have
   to abide
   ... PLS will let us define standard lexicons
   ... We need this.
   ... we picked up 5 SSML alements that are important to us
   ... say-as, phoneme, sub, emphasis, break
   ... all of the testing vendors are coming to the realization
   that they can do it with an attribute model
   ... epub3 already pioneered that
   ... a data-attribute model is being explored by some vendors as
   a solution for custom, built-in AT* assessessment delvery
   platforms
   ... Read Aloud for LD and Language Learners
   ... they took the attribute from the phoneme markeup and
   name-spaced it into epub
   ... and it works
   ... SSML Usage: There are <say-as interprea-as=“ordinal”> …
   ... CSS3 speech ‘speak-as’ property but not as complete as SSML
   say-as
   ... In the wild aria-label introduces other problems
   ... … we want a standard solution and not a custom solution for
   each AT
   ... <sub alias=“World Wide Web Consortium”>W3C</sub>

   Common table salt is really <span substitution=“Sodium
   Chloride”>NaCL</span>

   scribe: <emphasis level=“strong” huge </emphasis> bank account!
   ... SML Usage: Take a deep <break time=“3s”> …

   Content - a valid method (that doesnt break rendering) . …

   for most of these we can map to Mac

   mattking: in instances where people don’t want people modifying
   their speech you can make it a preference

   jcraig: most of these are in legacy speech engines

   mhakkinen: if the engines support SSML then we should be ok.
   ... what we have seen with the web speech api we can see who
   supports it.
   ... we are authoring the SSML now

   [40]https://github.com/mhakkinen/SSML-issues

     [40] https://github.com/mhakkinen/SSML-issues

   <alastairc> [41]https://github.com/mhakkinen/SSML-issues

     [41] https://github.com/mhakkinen/SSML-issues

   <mhakkinen_> [42]http://ets-research.org/ia11ylab/ssmltool/

     [42] http://ets-research.org/ia11ylab/ssmltool/

   <ShaneM> NOTE: I dont think it actually runs inside web driver.
   I think they use web driver to connect.... but not 100% certain

   <mhakkinen_> [43]http://ets-research.org/ia11ylab/ssmltool/

     [43] http://ets-research.org/ia11ylab/ssmltool/

   <mhakkinen_> [44]https://github.com/mhakkinen/SSML-issues

     [44] https://github.com/mhakkinen/SSML-issues

   <MichaelC> issue: Work on getting AT to follow pronunciation
   hints

   <trackbot> Created ISSUE-1045 - Work on getting at to follow
   pronunciation hints. Please complete additional details at
   <[45]http://www.w3.org/WAI/ARIA/track/issues/1045/edit>.

     [45] http://www.w3.org/WAI/ARIA/track/issues/1045/edit

   <MichaelC> associate issue-1045 with product-2

   <trackbot> issue-1045 (Work on getting at to follow
   pronunciation hints) associated with product-2.

   <MichaelC> issue-1045: see
   [46]https://github.com/mhakkinen/SSML-issues

     [46] https://github.com/mhakkinen/SSML-issues

   <trackbot> Notes added to issue-1045 Work on getting at to
   follow pronunciation hints.

   [47]https://www.w3.org/WAI/ARIA/track/issues/1045

     [47] https://www.w3.org/WAI/ARIA/track/issues/1045

   RRSAgent draft minutes

Summary of Action Items

Summary of Resolutions

   [End of minutes]
     __________________________________________________________


    Minutes formatted by David Booth's [48]scribe.perl version
    1.144 ([49]CVS log)
    $Date: 2016/09/22 17:19:46 $
     __________________________________________________________

     [48] http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/~checkout~/2002/scribe/scribedoc.htm
     [49] http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/2002/scribe/

Scribe.perl diagnostic output

   [Delete this section before finalizing the minutes.]
This is scribe.perl Revision: 1.144  of Date: 2015/11/17 08:39:34
Check for newer version at [50]http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/~checkout~/2002/
scribe/

     [50] http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/~checkout~/2002/scribe/

Guessing input format: RRSAgent_Text_Format (score 1.00)

Succeeded: s/mhakkinen://
Succeeded: s/help text/text help/
Succeeded: s/atleast/at least/
Succeeded: s/anually/anual/
Succeeded: s/scribe: jasonjgw/scribe: jasonjgw_/
Succeeded: s/test//
Succeeded: s/begpcause/because/
Succeeded: s/There are some very specific features that aren't in any ma
jor browser, but custom media features would be the best path./You are r
equesting some very specific features that aren't suppported by major pl
atform. Some of you have considered me dismissive of this idea in the pa
st, but I'm not opposed to it conceptually. I was dismissive of previous
 proposals because there was no clear path forward. CSS custom media fea
tures might be that clear path forward to [CUT]/
Succeeded: s/describeing/describing/
WARNING: Bad i/// command: i/o from WPT is raw JSON...
FAILED: i/o is more or less pass/fail
Succeeded: s/tests:/testable statements:/
Succeeded: s/tests/test directories/
WARNING: Bad s/// command: s/???/aria-haspopup/act-desc/busy
Succeeded: s/MichaelC: No. We should run a concept to develop the best p
roof of contest//
Succeeded: s/updates it /updates Git /
Succeeded: s/web driver/WebDriver/
Succeeded: s/MichielBijil/MichielBijl/G
Succeeded: s/reference code does not work?/reference workign code exampl
es?/
Succeeded: s/workign/working/
Succeeded: s/We get sued when /We have a critical need for /
Succeeded: s/california/some state in the US/
Succeeded: s/mhakkineen/mhakkinen/
WARNING: Bad s/// command: s/"[51]https://github.com/mhakkinen/SSSML-iss
ues"//
WARNING: Bad s/// command: s/[52]https://github.com/mhakkinen/SSSML-issu
es/ignore me/
Succeeded: s|[53]https://github.com/mhakkinen/SSSML-issues||
Succeeded: s|[54]https://github.com/mhakkinen/SSSML-issues||g
Succeeded: s|s/""//||
Succeeded: s|s//ignore me/||
Found Scribe: MichielBijl
Inferring ScribeNick: MichielBijl
WARNING: No scribe lines found matching previous ScribeNick pattern: <ri
chardschwerdtfeger> ...
Found Scribe: jasonjgw_
Inferring ScribeNick: jasonjgw_
Found Scribe: David-MacDonald
Found Scribe: David-MacDonald2
Found Scribe: david-macdonald
Found Scribe: David-Macdonald2
Inferring ScribeNick: David-Macdonald2
Found Scribe: david-macdonald__
Found Scribe: David-MacDonald3
Inferring ScribeNick: David-MacDonald3
Found Scribe: alastairc
Inferring ScribeNick: alastairc
Found Scribe: jcraig
Inferring ScribeNick: jcraig
Found ScribeNick: richardschwerdtfeger
Scribes: MichielBijl, jasonjgw_, David-MacDonald, David-MacDonald2, davi
d-macdonald__, David-MacDonald3, alastairc, jcraig
ScribeNicks: richardschwerdtfeger, MichielBijl, jasonjgw_, David-Macdona
ld2, David-MacDonald3, alastairc, jcraig
Present: Boaz_Sender Charles_LaPierre Debbie_Dahl EricE_(part) JF JamesN
urthen James_Craig Joanmarie_Diggs JohnJansen LJWatson MichaelC MichielB
ijl Mike_Pluke Shane_McCarron Sharron Sharron_Rush_(part) aboxhall alast
airc janina jcraig jessebeach matt_king
Agenda: [55]https://www.w3.org/WAI/ARIA/wiki/Meetings/TPAC_2016
Got date from IRC log name: 22 Sep 2016
Guessing minutes URL: [56]http://www.w3.org/2016/09/22-aria-minutes.html
People with action items:

     [51] https://github.com/mhakkinen/SSSML-issues
     [52] https://github.com/mhakkinen/SSSML-issues/ignore
     [53] https://github.com/mhakkinen/SSSML-issues
     [54] https://github.com/mhakkinen/SSSML-issues
     [55] https://www.w3.org/WAI/ARIA/wiki/Meetings/TPAC_2016
     [56] http://www.w3.org/2016/09/22-aria-minutes.html

WARNING: Input appears to use implicit continuation lines.
You may need the "-implicitContinuations" option.



   [End of [57]scribe.perl diagnostic output]

     [57] http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/~checkout~/2002/scribe/scribedoc.htm

Received on Thursday, 22 September 2016 17:23:30 UTC