Re: Alternative APG landmarks draft from Steve Faulkner on 2016-03-06 (public-aria@w3.org from March 2016)

From: Steve Faulkner <faulkner.steve@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 6 Mar 2016 22:07:03 +0000
To: Matt King <a11ythinker@gmail.com>
Cc: Léonie Watson <tink@tink.uk>, Michiel Bijl <michiel@agosto.nl>, ARIA Working Group <public-aria@w3.org>
Message-ID: <CA+ri+VmvZeRfUELVnpXJpGg_4BnS1O17Dai1+zp5cxYswd+RRA@mail.gmail.com>

On 6 March 2016 at 21:30, Matt King <a11ythinker@gmail.com> wrote:

> >There should be no requirement for the <section> element to have an
> accessible name.

There is no requirement, but there is an implicit requirement that AT only
expose section elements with accessible names to users.

--

Regards

SteveF
Current Standards Work @W3C
<http://www.paciellogroup.com/blog/2015/03/current-standards-work-at-w3c/>

Received on Sunday, 6 March 2016 22:08:11 UTC