Re: SVG AAM and mpping table script

On 13/04/2018 5:44 PM, Michael Cooper wrote:
> On 12/04/2018 11:02 PM, Amelia Bellamy-Royds wrote:
>>
>>
>>     First, what are the broken links you have to Core-AAM? I just
>>     checked Core-AAM and it seems I did apply the fix when
>>     publishing, so the ids are there on <tr>s. And I just checked
>>     SVG-AAM in the master branch (using a Respec snapshot) and don't
>>     find broken links to Core-AAM (nor to the others).
>>
>>
>> You're correct, sorry. Core-AAM was showing up as broken links when I 
>> was testing the Editor's Draft, but they work for the TR version.  In 
>> contrast, HTML-AAM was fine in ED, but not in TR. (Graphics-AAM is 
>> broken in both.)
>>
>>
>>     If there is a broken link that is the result of a publication
>>     fault, I can ask the webmaster for permission to fix. ...
>>
>>     I wouldn't want to touch a Candidate Recommendation (though I can
>>     ask the webmaster for permission to fix, as for Core-AAM).
>>
>>
>>
>> I'd *hope* this would count as a purely technical fix, not a 
>> substantive change to the spec.  But either way, I assume its going 
>> to require extra work for someone. So if Jason or someone else can 
>> fix the script properly first, that's great.
>>
>> But if you are able to start the process of asking the powers-that-be 
>> exactly how to make a fix like this to the published specs, that 
>> might help move things forward faster.
> I've asked the webmaster for permission to fix this in place for 
> graphics-aam. I'll let you know when I have a response. Michael
Graphics-AAM has been republished with the ids restored. Hopefully this 
unstick SVG-AAM publication. Michael
>>
>> ~A
>>
>

Received on Thursday, 19 April 2018 20:05:09 UTC