W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-aria-editors@w3.org > April 2018

Re: SVG AAM and mpping table script

From: Amelia Bellamy-Royds <amelia.bellamy.royds@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 12 Apr 2018 21:02:40 -0600
Message-ID: <CAFDDJ7zCEq-1kwET0hPTK7SJTrxbgQNTLkh=XjpaxYGTj61yVA@mail.gmail.com>
To: Michael Cooper <cooper@w3.org>
Cc: "Liam R. E. Quin" <liam@w3.org>, ARIA Editors <public-aria-editors@w3.org>
>
>
> First, what are the broken links you have to Core-AAM? I just checked
> Core-AAM and it seems I did apply the fix when publishing, so the ids are
> there on <tr>s. And I just checked SVG-AAM in the master branch (using a
> Respec snapshot) and don't find broken links to Core-AAM (nor to the
> others).
>

You're correct, sorry. Core-AAM was showing up as broken links when I was
testing the Editor's Draft, but they work for the TR version.  In contrast,
HTML-AAM was fine in ED, but not in TR. (Graphics-AAM is broken in both.)


>
> If there is a broken link that is the result of a publication fault, I can
> ask the webmaster for permission to fix. ...
>
I wouldn't want to touch a Candidate Recommendation (though I can ask the
> webmaster for permission to fix, as for Core-AAM).
>


I'd *hope* this would count as a purely technical fix, not a substantive
change to the spec.  But either way, I assume its going to require extra
work for someone. So if Jason or someone else can fix the script properly
first, that's great.

But if you are able to start the process of asking the powers-that-be
exactly how to make a fix like this to the published specs, that might help
move things forward faster.

~A
Received on Friday, 13 April 2018 03:03:03 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Friday, 13 April 2018 03:03:04 UTC