W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-aria-editors@w3.org > March 2016

Re: ReSpec instability

From: Joseph Scheuhammer <clown@alum.mit.edu>
Date: Fri, 4 Mar 2016 16:46:12 -0500
To: Shane McCarron <shane@aptest.com>, Michael Cooper <cooper@w3.org>
Cc: ARIA Editors <public-aria-editors@w3.org>
Message-ID: <56DA0224.9090501@alum.mit.edu>

I assume you received Shane's email quoted below about reverting to an 
older ReSpec.  A couple of questions.

1. Do we want to use the older version for the heartbeats next week?

2. Do we want to use the 'useExperimentalStyles' for the heartbeats?

I'll start the ball rolling for the core-aam and accname-aam by assuming 
"yes" to the first question, and changing which verison of respect they 
use.  I'm inclined to avoid the experimental style sheets, so I'll go 
that route unless you say otherwise.

BTW, thanks Shane!

On 2016-03-04 4:14 PM, Shane McCarron wrote:
> Folks,
> We (marcosc and I) know that ReSpec has been unstable the last week.  
> We are really really sorry.  We are working hard to settle things down.
> In the interim, we are aware that many of you need to get things done, 
> and that an unstable respec is making that challenging.  If you are 
> running into issues, you are welcome to use a version of it that I 
> have put up on a server from before we broke the world:
> https://spec-ops.io/respec-w3c-common.js
> If you want to use this, just comment out your current ReSpec line and 
> add a line like:
> <script src='https://spec-ops.io/respec-w3c-common.js' 
> class='remove'></script>
> This is version 3.2.97.  So if you want the new "styles" you should 
> set the useExperimentalStyles variable to true.
> Again, sorry!
> -- 
> Shane McCarron
> Managing Director, Applied Testing and Technology, Inc.


'Die Wahrheit ist Irgendwo da Drau├čen. Wieder.'
                  - C. Carter -
Received on Friday, 4 March 2016 21:46:46 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Friday, 4 March 2016 21:46:46 UTC