- From: White, Jason J <jjwhite@ets.org>
- Date: Fri, 26 Oct 2018 19:36:40 +0000
- To: Joanmarie Diggs <jdiggs@igalia.com>, ARIA Admin <public-aria-admin@w3.org>
+1
On 10/26/18, 15:23, "Joanmarie Diggs" <jdiggs@igalia.com> wrote:
This is a Call for Consensus (CfC) to the ARIA Working Group on the
question of accepting the revised draft charter (as written on
2018-10-26). That revision can be found at
https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Frawgit.com%2Fw3c%2Faria%2Fcharter%2Fcharter%2Findex.html&data=02%7C01%7Cjjwhite%40ets.org%7C2864b24b65b4448682e808d63b7882b1%7C0ba6e9b760b34fae92f37e6ddd9e9b65%7C0%7C0%7C636761786114822065&sdata=g5cCGlWT4zFoka5jo5jAVvDzE1bTU0EE%2BoZXIFlbweo%3D&reserved=0.
Background
The ARIA Working Group's proposed charter, found at
https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.w3.org%2F2018%2F03%2Fdraft-aria-charter&data=02%7C01%7Cjjwhite%40ets.org%7C2864b24b65b4448682e808d63b7882b1%7C0ba6e9b760b34fae92f37e6ddd9e9b65%7C0%7C0%7C636761786114822065&sdata=%2Fx1VIkQ%2Bg9XnoCocow%2Fo4%2Ffys6ZiQtx6XCXNEN0nKUI%3D&reserved=0, was presented to the
Advisory Committee for review and approval in July. The results of that
review were:
* 35: supports this Charter as is
* 1: abstains from this review
* 2: suggests changes to this Charter, and only supports the proposal if
the changes are adopted [Formal Objection]
We subsequently worked with the W3C management and the two organizations
suggesting changes in an attempt to resolve the concerns raised, the
bulk of which were related to the Success Criteria section of our
proposed charter. The result of that work is the rewritten success
criteria statement found here:
https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Frawgit.com%2Fw3c%2Faria%2Fcharter%2Fcharter%2Findex.html%23success-criteria&data=02%7C01%7Cjjwhite%40ets.org%7C2864b24b65b4448682e808d63b7882b1%7C0ba6e9b760b34fae92f37e6ddd9e9b65%7C0%7C0%7C636761786114822065&sdata=CYKUCvsyDbBfQ%2BiLP4PGdRVDEz6tkQyq57CA32RBkro%3D&reserved=0.
This rewritten statement was reviewed by the members of the ARIA Working
Group present at today's TPAC meeting (minutes:
https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.w3.org%2F2018%2F10%2F26-aria-minutes.html%23item04&data=02%7C01%7Cjjwhite%40ets.org%7C2864b24b65b4448682e808d63b7882b1%7C0ba6e9b760b34fae92f37e6ddd9e9b65%7C0%7C0%7C636761786114822065&sdata=OFXBBibJSVWYjF4kDYe6GVbAf%2BCYrQapLJpw4HG%2B8Zg%3D&reserved=0). The resolution
(found here:
https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.w3.org%2F2018%2F10%2F26-aria-minutes.html%23resolution02&data=02%7C01%7Cjjwhite%40ets.org%7C2864b24b65b4448682e808d63b7882b1%7C0ba6e9b760b34fae92f37e6ddd9e9b65%7C0%7C0%7C636761786114822065&sdata=NL7JakqD7JBfz3cV7Bf18e8Ip8r27lP5XpDQk1c1%2FzU%3D&reserved=0) is to
"Accept draft charter in 2018-10-26 form, send CfC to confirm during AC
final check".
For convenience, here is the new success criteria statement:
For the ARIA specifications, implementability and interoperability
of every feature will be demonstrated by having at least two
independent browser implementations of that feature. In addition,
for the Accessibility API Mapping specification(s), each ARIA
feature will be shown to have at least one implementation in each
of: ATK/AT-SPI2, MSAA+IAccessible2, AXAPI, and UIAutomation.
Every effort will be made to take member organizations' schedules
into account and to ensure all platforms are included. If needed,
an Accessibility API Mapping specification will be split into
platform-specific specifications, e.g. one for ATK/AT-SPI2, one for
MSAA+IAccessible2, one for AXAPI, and one for UIAutomation. This
will allow each platform's specification to progress along the Rec
track at the timeline that best suits them. For specifications which
are not split apart in this fashion, no platform will be dropped out
of the specification without prior consultation with that platform's
owners.
We believe that this new language ensures that we do not relax the
requirements the W3C and its member organizations expect of Working
Groups, that we do include all platforms in our specifications, and that
we can still progress along the Rec track in a relatively timely
fashion. We hope that the members of the Advisory Committee will agree.
In the meantime, as per the resolution from today's meeting, we would
like your input on this CfC.
Action
This CfC is now open for objection, comment, as well as statements of35
support via email. Silence will be interpreted as support, though
messages of support are certainly welcome.
If you object to this proposal, or have comments concerning it, please
respond by replying on list to this message no later than 17:00 Boston
Time, Friday, 2 November 2018.
For objections only, please copy the main public-aria@w3.org list to
allow technical discussion of the objection to happen there.
Process
This CfC is conducted per the ARIA WG decision policy:
https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.w3.org%2FWAI%2FARIA%2Fdecision-policy&data=02%7C01%7Cjjwhite%40ets.org%7C2864b24b65b4448682e808d63b7882b1%7C0ba6e9b760b34fae92f37e6ddd9e9b65%7C0%7C0%7C636761786114822065&sdata=MQ%2FtVZ0DTMzShVnUtYwy6suWTiPR4RgUmRGWaJBbIb4%3D&reserved=0
________________________________
This e-mail and any files transmitted with it may contain privileged or confidential information. It is solely for use by the individual for whom it is intended, even if addressed incorrectly. If you received this e-mail in error, please notify the sender; do not disclose, copy, distribute, or take any action in reliance on the contents of this information; and delete it from your system. Any other use of this e-mail is prohibited.
Thank you for your compliance.
________________________________
Received on Friday, 26 October 2018 19:37:06 UTC