W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-argumentation@w3.org > April 2013

RE: Interesting paper bearing on formal argument representation

From: Tom Breton (Tehom) <tehom@panix.com>
Date: Wed, 24 Apr 2013 22:11:59 -0400
Message-ID: <b533374fa9686d89fefb56b71e1be613.squirrel@mail.panix.com>
To: "Adam Sobieski" <adamsobieski@hotmail.com>, "public argumentation" <public-argumentation@w3.org>
> Tom,
> Thanks for the letter.  Unlike the authors who's paper you referenced, I
> (we?) know that we can do better than AIF.  I can add some content to the
> page about AIF.  What are some other major formats which might deserve
> mention?

LKIF is the other that has a significant claim as a de facto standard.

Two related observations:

 * PML, which you linked to, looks promising.  First time I've seen it,
 * Araucaria is apparently renouncing AML.

	Tom Breton (Tehom)
Received on Thursday, 25 April 2013 02:12:20 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 19:40:03 UTC