Re: Tweaks to the Archives proposal [via Schema Architypes Community Group]

Thanks Adrian. 

I had dropped in a link to it and other things but the community web tool dropped them when producing the email from the post. 

Full post here: https://www.w3.org/community/architypes/2017/06/29/tweaks-to-the-archives-proposal/

~Richard


> On 29 Jun 2017, at 15:11, Adrian Stevenson <Adrian.Stevenson@jisc.ac.uk> wrote:
> 
> Hi All
> 
> I think Richard forgot to drop the link in for the notes from the session I took. I haven't had a chance to review them so I hope they make sense.
> 
> https://docs.google.com/document/d/1pi7RtkfQtUlJjQFyCb-O20sy6y-Iru0FcLCehMwD0NI/mobilebasic
> 
> Adrian 
> 
> On 29 Jun 2017, at 14:36, W3C Community Development Team <team-community-process@w3.org> wrote:
> 
>> Following an active and interesting discussion at the LODLAM Summit 2017 
>> (notes from the session here) I have made some small tweaks to the proposed
>> model.
>> 
>>    Added a new property holdingArchive to the ArchiveCollection Type
>> This is an inverse property to the archiveHeld property of Archive.  Although
>> the Schema.org community does not encourage inverse properties I believe we may
>> have good pragmatic case here where the use-cases could include an Archive
>> holding a significant number of collections which would preclude their
>> individual listing on the Archive type.
>>    Confirmed that itemLocation is a property of ArchiveItem and replaces the
>> originally proposed use of location.
>> 
>> I have updated the model diagram and examples on the proposal page in the
>> wiki to reflect these changes.  They have also been reflected in the Archive
>> prototype Schema.org instance.
>> 
>> If people are happy with these changes, I suggest we move to proposing this
>> initial extension to the broader Schema.org community.
>> 
>> I have had some people indicate that if it was accepted they would be prepared
>> to look at implementing it in systems to which they have access/influence.  
>> Such support always helps with the submission of proposals to Schema.org, please
>> let me know if a) You could make such a commitment and b) if you would want that
>> to be known publicly or not.
>> 
>>  
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> ----------
>> 
>> This post sent on Schema Architypes Community Group
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 'Tweaks to the Archives proposal'
>> 
>> https://www.w3.org/community/architypes/2017/06/29/tweaks-to-the-archives-proposal/
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> Learn more about the Schema Architypes Community Group: 
>> 
>> https://www.w3.org/community/architypes
>> 
>> 
>> 
> 
> Jisc is a registered charity (number 1149740) and a company limited by guarantee which is registered in England under Company No. 5747339, VAT No. GB 197 0632 86. Jisc’s registered office is: One Castlepark, Tower Hill, Bristol, BS2 0JA. T 0203 697 5800.
> 
> Jisc Services Limited is a wholly owned Jisc subsidiary and a company limited by guarantee which is registered in England under company number 2881024, VAT number GB 197 0632 86. The registered office is: One Castle Park, Tower Hill, Bristol BS2 0JA. T 0203 697 5800.